Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

As often happens in these debates...

October 14, 2018 03:59AM
people start changing the premise.

No one argues that an elite QB is worth his weight in gold.

Do you take Tom Brady or Jim Brown? Well...I get it.

But, while I'm a Mayfield fan, I'm guessing he isn't Drew Brees. Sam Darnold, while I'm not a big fan, let's say he is I dunno...pick someone who was good.

Saquan Barkley is the perfect storm. Running inside and outside, power, speed, blocking, great receiving. Not just good. But showing greatness in all facets. He's a guy that is doing something special almost every game...multiple times.

Drew Brees started winning again when? When the two headed monster showed up...and really it wasn't until Kamara came on the scene. Why? Because that threat from the backfield was a game changer. Running the ball, short passes...utilized clock. Until Kamara, showed up, Brees was getting lots of passing yards while the Saints fell into mediocrity.

I think what it shows is that "in today's game", it's vital to have that threat in the backfield...unless your Tom Brady.

So, I still think, after all debate, that Barkley was not just the right choice, but clearly the right choice. If Darnold was drafted by the Giants, he still would be on the bench. The Giants would still need help up front. If the Giants play this right, they go find a QB, whether it be the draft or free agency. They will have the type of runnning back that today's game calls for...and probably the best at it...with all due respect to Todd Gurley.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Wow, not this has to settle the debate. Doesn't it?

RamUK613October 13, 2018 01:46PM

  Re: Wow, not this has to settle the debate. Doesn't it?

zn147October 13, 2018 01:56PM

  But why on earth would you assume that?

RamUK143October 13, 2018 02:35PM

  I was confusing sorry

zn117October 13, 2018 03:21PM

  Re: Not really....

dzrams113October 13, 2018 02:44PM

  There are probably no more than about a dozen or so elits QB's

RamUK65October 13, 2018 06:09PM

  Re: There are probably no more than about a dozen or so elits QB's

zn55October 13, 2018 06:30PM

  Curious, how do we define a franchise QB?

RamUK85October 14, 2018 03:35AM

  Re: Curious, how do we define a franchise QB?

zn50October 14, 2018 04:06AM

  Re: I said "franchise to elite..."

dzrams87October 13, 2018 07:04PM

  okay

zn55October 13, 2018 07:08PM

  I think that's a dangerous conclusion to draw

RamUK64October 14, 2018 03:26AM

  Re: There's plenty of evidence that it's a trend...

dzrams57October 14, 2018 07:33AM

  As often happens in these debates...

jemach53October 14, 2018 03:59AM

  Re: Wow, not this has to settle the debate. Doesn't it?

Classicalwit82October 13, 2018 05:07PM

  Almost absurd as

RamUK113October 13, 2018 06:06PM

  Re: Wow, not this has to settle the debate. Doesn't it?

KeithA3971October 13, 2018 08:56PM

  Re: Wow, not this has to settle the debate. Doesn't it?

zn58October 13, 2018 09:08PM

  So Faulk wasn't an elite RB because he never topped the league in yards

Deadpool62October 13, 2018 09:21PM

  Clearly you haven't been following it!

RamUK55October 14, 2018 03:13AM

  The GSOT would have never been the GSOT...

jemach62October 14, 2018 04:01AM