Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: by whom? wicket smaht

October 13, 2018 12:53PM
Quote
Florida_Ram
Quote
Rampage2K-
Quote
zn
Quote
promomasterj
Can we move on from the stache once and for all. His w-l record as a head coach - the only metric that counts - is a losing one. He was not a good coach.

Les Snead was also there for the drafts and is still there so maybe he's the common thread.

And where is old jeffry these days - oh yeah, unemployed.

Others are adding that. I deliberately avoided it.

My point is simple: you do not have an overnight turnaround, no matter who the coach is, unless you have some key talent on hand. That was said against Cowherder's idea that McV demonstrates there's a new standard for turnarounds. Naw. McV was bound to be a good one but the overnight part of it comes from having inherited talent, as it always does.

Now is that about "Fisher"? Only if you are obsessed with Fisher.

First it's true as a general principle regardless--overnight turnarounds require inherited talent. Like what Harbaugh did in SF v. what Carroll had to do in Seattle. Unless someone wants to offer some counter-examples, that point stands.

Second, in terms of who acquired the talent that's as much Snead as Fisher anyway and Snead is still a Ram. So that card never had to be played.

I don't see the point of dismissing the significance of having a Goff, Gurley, and Donald on hand just because someone always has to get in digs at Fisher. That's not realistic and it's not good analysis.

You want people to move on, cool, me too. In fact in this discussion I had. I wasn't the one who turned the discussion that direction.

...


I think you're making Colin's point...Fisher had talent, just couldn't do anything with it.....McVay takes basically the same team and has history making turnaround

All teams have talent, you don't make it to the NFL without it.....what separates talent is coaching.

McVay has set a really high bar though.....if owners think it's easy finding someone like him they're fooling themselves


Although I think he will be the next Belicheck(without the cheating scandals) I think we need to win some post season games though before we officially anoint McVay as the next great coach.

There are some high IQ, wicked smart posters on this board that I look up to.

"You are one of them"




sst smiley



[www.instagram.com]
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  McVay has every coach on the hot seat-Cowherd

Rampage2K-696October 11, 2018 07:15PM

  to me Cowherd draws the wrong conclusions

zn287October 11, 2018 07:40PM

  Re: to me Cowherd draws the wrong conclusions

Rams43368October 11, 2018 07:58PM

  All I think Cowherd is saying

SUretHing217October 11, 2018 08:03PM

  Re: to me Cowherd draws the wrong conclusions

zn209October 11, 2018 08:09PM

  Re: to me Cowherd draws the wrong conclusions

Rams43237October 12, 2018 08:30AM

  Re: to me Cowherd draws the wrong conclusions

bigjimram2195October 13, 2018 05:15AM

  Re: How about we split it down the middle?

dzrams204October 11, 2018 08:13PM

  Re: How about we split it down the middle?

zn191October 11, 2018 08:30PM

  to develop that

zn172October 11, 2018 11:34PM

  Re: Fair enough...I missed the hints...NM

dzrams262October 12, 2018 08:17AM

  Re: Fair enough..,

zn220October 12, 2018 03:55PM

  Re: to me Cowherd draws the wrong conclusions

Rampage2K-168October 11, 2018 08:15PM

  Ahh the obligatory Fisher plug :)

promomasterj176October 12, 2018 08:23AM

  by whom?

zn160October 12, 2018 04:04PM

  Re: by whom?

Rampage2K-261October 13, 2018 11:00AM

  Re: by whom? wicket smaht

Anonymous User203October 13, 2018 11:19AM

  Re: by whom? wicket smaht

Rampage2K-92October 13, 2018 12:53PM

  Re: by whom?

zn271October 13, 2018 11:47AM

  Re: by whom?

max135October 13, 2018 12:02PM

  Re: by whom?

zn332October 13, 2018 12:32PM

  Re: by whom?

Rampage2K-116October 13, 2018 12:48PM

  Re: by whom?

max80October 13, 2018 01:01PM

  Re: by whom?

max89October 13, 2018 12:49PM

  Only had to complete it?

RamUK123October 13, 2018 12:42PM

  Issue is players are playing so much better

Rams_81189October 12, 2018 07:38AM

  Wow there are lots of good points in these arguments

David Deacon170October 12, 2018 09:14AM

  Wow lots of good points in these arguments: Yes, David Deacon

Anonymous User206October 13, 2018 11:07AM