I don't know why you count both of these as "comeback wins."

(1) Game 3 - 2014 against DAL , Rodgers comeback win. 26-21

They were down by 1 point at the start of the 4th quarter. How does that meet the traditional and accepted definition of a comeback, which means down by a score into the 4th?

That's just the lead changing hands in a close game.

Plus since GB scored with more than 9 minutes left, according to your own logic, that should be a win for the defense, since Dallas had a series with time left after GB took the lead.

It's certainly a game winning drive. One of 20 GWD's in AR's career (144 starts). PFR lists him as having 13 comebacks (which are different from GWD's though sometimes it can be both). [www.pro-football-reference.com]

To be fair PFR counts that one as a comeback. I stated why I have doubts about that.

2. Game 6 - 2016 against DAL, Rodgers comeback win. 34-31

Now THAT'S a clutch drive. GB takes the lead after the game was tied with 0:35 left.

---

So anyway as I said all qb's stats on this even out the way that completion percentage does. That's why the highest possible percentage on wins in this situation is 51%. Just as often a receiver drops the ball or a tackle allows a sack or the defense allows a score. It evens out.

So in order to do special and different stats for Rodgers, you need to do them for everyone. Then there are percentages to compare, and you find out if he at the norm, below the norm, or above the norm.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 09/10/2018 01:14PM by zn.