December 29, 2017 01:30PM
The idea that had the Rams won the last couple years in St. Louis the league would have never allowed them to move to LA is a bogus premise as well.

The league wanted the Rams in LA whether they won or lost in St. Louis. And the stadium issue in St. Louis was pretty cut and dry. They could not prevent the Rams from leaving and the Rams and league wanted them to leave for LA win or lose in St. Louis. End of story.

If anything, Stan hired Fisher with the hopes he'd have them winning by the time they left St. Louis and could transition that into LA. He just didn't realize he was hiring a guy who had no ability to do that.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  The Fisher conundrum...

Ramsdude554December 29, 2017 11:17AM

  Re: The Fisher conundrum...

stlrams13317December 29, 2017 11:23AM

  Re: The Fisher conundrum...

Ramsdude192December 29, 2017 11:29AM

  Re: No bueno.....

laram199December 29, 2017 11:34AM

  Re: +1...

dzrams172December 29, 2017 11:36AM

  Re: +1...

Ramsdude206December 29, 2017 11:48AM

  Re: +1...

MamaRAMa186December 29, 2017 12:06PM

  Re: +1...

Ramsdude185December 29, 2017 12:17PM

  Re: +1...

MamaRAMa246December 29, 2017 12:19PM

  Re: The pay-off Mama? 4-12!!...NM

laram190December 29, 2017 12:57PM

  +1 nm

Ram Fan Teacher192December 29, 2017 11:39AM

  In addition to that, and perhaps most importantly

9er8er150December 29, 2017 01:30PM

  Re: The Fisher conundrum...

waterfield185December 29, 2017 12:33PM

  Re: The Fisher conundrum...

Ramsdude180December 29, 2017 12:53PM

  Re: The Fisher conundrum...

idaram223December 29, 2017 01:32PM

  Re: The Fisher conundrum...

Ramsdude299December 29, 2017 01:40PM