I’ll restate my opinion, dz.

It is my opinion that our O is more unpredictable and more effective with Tavon on the sideline and Gurley, Woods, Watkins, Kupp, and Higbee on the field.

I’m willing to sacrifice the “decoy factor” with Tavon in order to gain the more dependable positive results of the above players play after play.

My 5 mentioned O players give the D plenty enough to worry about on any given play. Why try to out-trick the D when you have such talent to out execute them?

This is the point that I think we disagree upon.

Neither of us is likely to change the other’s mind. So, might as well agree to disagree? Until the next time that I can’t bite my tongue soon enough? Lol.

Peace.