Quote
laram
Quote
In any event if they are right now still short of Suh's money this late in the game, then it is way past initial offer stage.
Since we're questioning who said they were short? I certainly didn't.
The deal has been on the table for awhile now and there was a counter.
As I said in a post weeks ago contrary to what was being reported they were way off on length and value.
Sometimes the divide is so far apart you just can't strike a balance. Somebody will have to flinch for this deal to get done IMO.
And yeah when you say that you see it differently that's questioning. .
Now you lost me. When I said "I see it differently" it did not refer to the info itself. It referred to whether I thought the offer in question was fair. Doing that is not doubting the info. They are 2 entirely different things.
I did 2 things.
1. I accepted your info.
2. Having done that, I then I thought out loud about whether the Rams offer is reasonable.
#2 is not questioning you as a source or your info. That's me using my own judgment to think about what sounds fair in this case. Doing that does not qualify or take back step #1. It's a wholly separate thing. In fact, I can't use your info to wonder aloud if the Rams offer is fair and then doubt the info at the same time. In order for me to wonder if the offer was fair, I have to accept the info as valid in the first place.
...
Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 08/10/2017 10:38AM by zn.