Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

which is not an argument for not paying Donald

May 30, 2017 07:46AM
It is just not simply "either/or." It's NOT Goff v. Donald.

Works like this. No matter how good your offense is the defense makes it better. Which is why the 99 Rams (6th on defense) went somewhere while the 2000 Rams (23rd on defense) didn't. Yet, if anything, the 2000 offense was better than the 99 offense.

Okay name the one position that if it is very good improves an entire defense.

Defensive tackle.

If you have one of the rarest commodities in football---an elite defensive tackle---that player will automatically draw the kind of attention that helps out the other defenders. No offense can ignore an elite DT---he is the defender closest to the initial action, and so must be controlled no matter what. And an elite tackle---talking about the genuinely rare caliber of DT like Olson,. Sapp, Randy While, Lilly, Page, Joe Greene--not only necessarily and automatically draws attention at the game plan level, they are ALSO productive in spite of that attention.

There are far more good qbs in NFL history than there are elite caliber DTs.

One guy put it this way. Some players can change the game on Sundays. Donald changes the game on MONDAYS.

You cannot scoff at that, diminish it, act like it's no big deal, downplay it. Well you can try but it will never be a good football argument.

ESPECIALLY when there is no reason on earth to believe it's either/or. The way they cap works they can pay a top qb AND pay Donald.

And they can ALSO have 6-8 more guys with top contracts too.

Virtually every single team gives half the cap to 8-10 players. Donald will be one of them when it comes to the Rams.

.



Edited 3 time(s). Last edit at 05/30/2017 07:49AM by zn.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  This team will go as Goff goes; not as Donald goes

RockRam599May 30, 2017 04:50AM

  Can't make chicken soup from chicken poop

RFIP341May 30, 2017 04:57AM

  That couldn't be further from the point

RockRam278May 30, 2017 05:05AM

  Re: Disagree with the premise...

dzrams317May 30, 2017 07:22AM

  Re: Disagree with the premise...

laram314May 30, 2017 08:05AM

  Tim Ryan always says

RFIP317May 30, 2017 08:16AM

  Re: Especially when you consider that the Rams...

laram233May 30, 2017 08:28AM

  No, you are reading into my post something that is not there

RockRam230May 30, 2017 08:50AM

  Re: Agree on Goff...what's that have to do with Donald?

dzrams222May 30, 2017 09:10AM

  which is not an argument for not paying Donald

zn282May 30, 2017 07:46AM

  Good points but

Hazlet Hacksaw215May 30, 2017 09:17AM

  Re: Good points but

zn211May 30, 2017 10:45AM

  Re: This team will go as Goff goes; not as Donald goes

Rams43224May 30, 2017 08:01AM

  I'd hate to see Donald go..., but just for fun....

RAMbler395May 30, 2017 10:19AM