Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Hindsight being 20/20 (JJenkins)

December 13, 2016 06:35AM
Hindsight being 20/20 it appears that allowing Jenkins walk was one out of dozens of mistakes the front office made. Could the Rams have kept him for less than the Giants got him for? Who knows but it seemed like Jenkins was truly insulted by the Rams initial offer and they never really seemed to intent on keeping him. There were many that were happy enough to see him walk because we had Gaines, but Gaines is starting to look a lot like Saffold when it comes to injuries. TruJo hasn't been bad but hasn't been outstanding either. His numbers (int's and the like) have gone down this year like the numbers of the #1 CB's always do because teams will attack the weaker link, allowing that player to get those stats. Early in his career JJ was just as likely to get burnt as he was to snag an int but he improved every year (say that for Fisher he could develop players on defense). Now the Rams are in a quandary because I don't think the TruJo has earned big CB money but the Rams cabinet is bare because it would be foolish to put too much faith in Gaines holding up. I was always more for paying franchise money to Jenks, who I saw as having elite CB potential as opposed to TruJo who I saw more of a size/speed plus inflated stats by virtue of playing opposite JJ guy. Sadly a player personnel/draft thread while lucky team's fans are writing playoff ones.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Hindsight being 20/20 (JJenkins)

RamsDynasty507December 13, 2016 06:35AM

  I valued Jenks more than tru...but stats and other intangibles

SunTzu_vs_Camus243December 13, 2016 07:08AM

  Re: I valued Jenks more than tru...but stats and other intangibles

SoCalRAMatic294December 13, 2016 07:16AM

  I agree...but MOST folks did not and thot Tru was the guy to TAG...iirc

SunTzu_vs_Camus270December 13, 2016 08:13AM

  It never should have been either-or

ArizonaRamFan186December 13, 2016 08:18AM

  agreed!

SunTzu_vs_Camus293December 13, 2016 08:19AM

  I was criticized when I said this was another reason to fire Snead

promomasterj215December 13, 2016 08:39AM

  absolutely right

ArizonaRamFan328December 13, 2016 08:43AM

  Jenkins was going to test the market no matter what

LesBaker258December 13, 2016 08:53AM

  Re: Its not always about "outbidding" another team...

laram195December 13, 2016 09:11AM

  In this case he wanted to get paid

LesBaker353December 13, 2016 09:27AM

  Exactly right.

RockRam248December 13, 2016 09:54AM

  Re: I was criticized when I said this was another reason to fire Snead

Rams43193December 13, 2016 09:35AM