Quote
zn
Quote
Rams43
But there is a reason that Fisher is making the change at QB.
Jeez, man.
Conversations are just plain BAD if one side just does not every actually hear the other side.
First, do you honestly believe that there is one single solitary individual who prefers Keenum over Goff, didn't want the change, or thinks Keenum is better?
Is that the hallucinatory world you walk around in?
All I said---and it's true---is that Keenum is better at the deep, 31+ yarders than a lot of people seem to give him credit for. So what if I said that? Why does that require that kind of response?
And for YOU that's a qb controversy issue? (?????)
I like Goff before he was picked and said I would be fine with either Wentz or Goff When there were all these conspiracy theories about way he wasn't playing, I defended Goff---including against the nutcase Johnson theory that he was a bust (
).
You want the truth? Here's the truth. Rams are already throwing deep (31+ yarders) at a higher percentage than many other teams. That's just attempts. And their completion percentage is actually pretty good in that range.
And saying that means you think Goff has to be defended?
Kind of amazing..................
For the record I said several times Goff could even be better at it...which would be this great bonus, since they're already good at it.
....
Were you replying to my last post, zn?
If so, this rant is mystifying, man. I suggest you re read my post (rather than just the last sentence) and then decide if you still disagree. You have been known to respond to what you THOUGHT was said, rather than what was actually said.
And I also suggest that you tone down the rhetoric in your future replies. This one seemed a little personal. Heck, my post was a reply to Grits, for crying out loud.