Quote
promomasterj
There, that's the reason it's better to play them. It IS better. It's better for the team. If it's not good for the QB - too bad. They probably weren't going to be very good anyway. There. I'm saying it.
No you don't. Instead what you do is break his initial learning curve into 2 stages. The mental stuff and film study and learning technique stuff, then taking reps in games. There are advantages to dividing that into 2 stages.
Meanwhile if he never plays his rookie year he still has 4 to go. That's not the kind of thing where you sweat bullets. Plus if you have ever judged a qb, which you doubtless have cause you're a football fan, did it really take you more than 4 years to figure out if he could play? Naw.
Again...BECAUSE QBS
HAVE DEVELOPED BOTH WAYS, all throughout the entire history of the league, we know for absolute certain that both ways work. There's really no doubt there, and trying to scramble up some to make an argument isn't working for you.
There's no "rule" here and it doesn't do much good to pretend there is.
Both ways have worked. We know that. Both ways have their own advantages and disadvantages. We know that.
.