you said...
But Case Keenum is right there. I mean RIGHT there. If he says there's been a "lot of change and it's a lot to process", I think I have to believe it. Right?You seem to imply this is a bad thing. If i misinterpreted than I apologize.
My response is that the offense from last year needed to change so I have no problem with introducing change even if its "alot to process". Im assuming perhaps incorrectly that CK is referring to the introduction of new passing concepts from groh within the existing. But your right, I dont know that for sure. Either way im unopposed to a change from last year.
the problem I have is that the author and many here seem to take this information and turn it into inept coaching. Again, it may be. But it may be other things. Personally, if its coaching...I suspect it will eventually leak out from a palyer or too.