April 17, 2024 07:42AM
Because I suspect none of them do. So if that's the case, choosing in the first round at all isn't wise. But if we acknowledge that the draft is a crap shoot from top to bottom then evaluators should really just take the player the like.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 04/17/2024 07:52AM by Ram_Ruler.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Here is why you don't spend 1st rounders on QBs or WRs

RockRam320April 17, 2024 05:40AM

  Did they list the hit rate for other positions?

ferragamo7990April 17, 2024 06:52AM

  Re: Did they list the hit rate for other positions?

Rams4375April 17, 2024 07:23AM

  Not quite. Hit rate apparently depends on the position chosen

RockRam69April 17, 2024 07:33AM

  I'd be interested to see what positions have a safe hit rate

Ram_Ruler54April 17, 2024 07:42AM

  Re: I'd be interested to see what positions have a safe hit rate

cool_hand_luke45April 17, 2024 08:13AM

  Re: I'd be interested to see what positions have a safe hit rate

Ram_Ruler51April 17, 2024 08:19AM

  I meant what is hit rate other position in 1st CB LOT RB etc

ferragamo7950April 17, 2024 08:28AM

  No.

RockRam61April 17, 2024 07:29AM

  also curious of sample size

ferragamo7951April 17, 2024 08:34AM

  makes zero sense

Rampage2K-56April 17, 2024 09:46AM

  Re: Here is why you don't spend 1st rounders on QBs or WRs

kw1345April 17, 2024 10:33AM

  So to be clear, you don't want to win Super Bowls?

Deadpool64April 17, 2024 11:50AM

  C'mon. How many 1st round QB picks were NOT those guys?

RockRam57April 17, 2024 12:10PM

  Re: C'mon. How many 1st round QB picks were NOT those guys?

Rampage2K-50April 17, 2024 12:39PM

  Fair enough, but

Deadpool41April 17, 2024 12:58PM