Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Could trade back

April 06, 2024 05:16AM
Quote
Ramdemic
Fair response. To be clear, I don't recommend trading up for anyone this draft. I just don't want to trade back to 28,29, 30 and miss out on our targets and then pick what? Guyton, AD Mitchell, Mckinnstry. None of that sounds great. I think by 28 , all our targets may be gone, even Chop, who I don't particularly trust.

and get a WR, CB, Edge, DT---even future QB

Not that I want to do that --- some of those positions I don't want, but seems Sweat (not my fav, but he has some good things from what I've seen) will be there
in early 2nd, Fiske --- either of those two might end up being better than Murphey and Newton. Maybe not, but we just disagree. In deep draft, get as many
players as you can in the top 100. A trade down could get a mid-#2 and a late 3rd. Possibly ... 2 more players in top 100 would be grat as long as Rams don;t
lose quality going to say 25-28

Also, in deep draft I would trade 2 5ths to get a 4th and 2 6ths to get a 5th. Don't need all those 5th and 6ths ... to trade up to get 2 guys in the 130-170 range.

then finish wit the 200+ guys, one which can be a kicker.

But never say never. If a top 10 (as Rams grade him) is there at 19, then sure grab him. Sometimes even a top 6-7-8 guy can fall for various reasons.

Also, if indeed Dallas Turner is all that. trading up is possible if he falls to say 14-15 and Rams could trade down...

I am for trading down but can see scenarios that are stay the same or trade up. That's how I see it.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  So we are clear this years draft is deep next years draft is not

Stafford9399April 05, 2024 07:51AM

  Re: So we are clear this years draft is deep next years draft is not

Ramdemic92April 05, 2024 10:11AM

  Are Newton and Murphy position of need picks

Stafford942April 06, 2024 06:43AM

  Re: Are Newton and Murphy position of need picks

Ramdemic43April 06, 2024 07:01AM

  Rams may trade next year's 1 round to trade up this year

ramzilla87April 05, 2024 03:48PM

  Joe Alt

den-the-coach81April 05, 2024 05:27PM

  Re: Joe Alt

merlin51April 06, 2024 06:58AM

  Re: Joe Alt

21Dog45April 06, 2024 08:16AM

  It's a good question --- but would Rams settle for a 2024 #2 and pay a 2025 #1 for it?

JimYoungblood5378April 05, 2024 06:01PM

  Re: It's a good question --- but would Rams settle for a 2024 #2 and pay a 2025 #1 for it?

ramzilla53April 05, 2024 07:23PM

  Not always

JimYoungblood5352April 05, 2024 08:31PM

  Re: Not always

Ramdemic34April 06, 2024 03:41AM

  That's fine but maybe I haven't been paying attention

JimYoungblood5339April 06, 2024 04:32AM

  Re: That's fine but maybe I haven't been paying attention

Ramdemic40April 06, 2024 04:46AM

  Could trade back

JimYoungblood5345April 06, 2024 05:16AM

  Just as a note on WRs ...

alyoshamucci64April 06, 2024 06:06AM

  Thanks --- maybe it would be prudent to get a WR high

JimYoungblood5340April 06, 2024 06:39AM

  Interesting

Stafford938April 06, 2024 06:36AM