Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Not always

April 05, 2024 08:31PM
Quote
ramzilla
If you are a bad to average team, you want more picks
to shore up several positions to become at least a good team.

If you are a good to very good team attempting to be a Super Bowl team,
I think what you need, are "difference makers", and so you do not need many picks
just a few picks of players who would give you the edge in playoff games.

Depends on too many factors.

Rams, to be better, need to get and edge. And also need to get an interior player
and need young CBs (White- 1 year deal, Williams 2-year deal), need WRs
only have a few on contract after this year.

And if you want good ones---you need to get them in 1st 3 rounds, check out the
success.failure rate of the rounds ...

So, in one case, if you can get a great rushers, you know will be great, sure go get him.

But in the case of Newton and Murphy, not seeing anything THAT special about them
so that they are so much better than the 2nd round-graded guys.

So, trading back for a good team is as viable as trading up. IMO, there are no hard and fast
rules that say Rams think they can get to SB by trading a pair of 1s and a couple of 2s to get into
top 10, let's say.

Makes as much sense, in a deep draft, to get an extra pick or two in the top 50,75 or so, while still
getting as good a player at, say, 27 as they would at 19.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  So we are clear this years draft is deep next years draft is not

Stafford9399April 05, 2024 07:51AM

  Re: So we are clear this years draft is deep next years draft is not

Ramdemic92April 05, 2024 10:11AM

  Are Newton and Murphy position of need picks

Stafford942April 06, 2024 06:43AM

  Re: Are Newton and Murphy position of need picks

Ramdemic43April 06, 2024 07:01AM

  Rams may trade next year's 1 round to trade up this year

ramzilla87April 05, 2024 03:48PM

  Joe Alt

den-the-coach81April 05, 2024 05:27PM

  Re: Joe Alt

merlin51April 06, 2024 06:58AM

  Re: Joe Alt

21Dog45April 06, 2024 08:16AM

  It's a good question --- but would Rams settle for a 2024 #2 and pay a 2025 #1 for it?

JimYoungblood5378April 05, 2024 06:01PM

  Re: It's a good question --- but would Rams settle for a 2024 #2 and pay a 2025 #1 for it?

ramzilla53April 05, 2024 07:23PM

  Not always

JimYoungblood5351April 05, 2024 08:31PM

  Re: Not always

Ramdemic34April 06, 2024 03:41AM

  That's fine but maybe I haven't been paying attention

JimYoungblood5339April 06, 2024 04:32AM

  Re: That's fine but maybe I haven't been paying attention

Ramdemic40April 06, 2024 04:46AM

  Could trade back

JimYoungblood5345April 06, 2024 05:16AM

  Just as a note on WRs ...

alyoshamucci64April 06, 2024 06:06AM

  Thanks --- maybe it would be prudent to get a WR high

JimYoungblood5339April 06, 2024 06:39AM

  Interesting

Stafford938April 06, 2024 06:36AM