Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: I wouldn't be against a WR...

February 17, 2023 03:57AM
In recent years the Rams seem to plug their holes with serviceable players before the draft. Then the draft is all about upgrading certain positions rather than drafting for need in an area where they have no one.

So yeah, it wouldn't surprise me if the Rams signed both an OL and an edge before the draft and allowed themselves to pick a premier player who falls to 36 rather than being forced to fill a glaring need.



AlbaNY_Ram
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Blinkscout curveball ... exploring top WRs in the draft.

alyoshamucci292February 16, 2023 07:27AM

  Re: Blinkscout curveball ... exploring top WRs in the draft.

ramBRO169February 16, 2023 08:18AM

  "If he'd have us"

alyoshamucci113February 16, 2023 08:34AM

  I wouldn't be against a WR...

LMU93117February 16, 2023 08:39AM

  Re: I wouldn't be against a WR...

alyoshamucci102February 16, 2023 09:08AM

  good point

LMU9354February 17, 2023 03:23AM

  Re: I wouldn't be against a WR...

AlbaNY_Ram48February 17, 2023 03:57AM

  Re: I wouldn't be against a WR...

SoCalRAMatic37February 17, 2023 05:38AM

  Here’s what I THINK Snead’s strategy might be…

Rams43149February 16, 2023 10:04AM

  Re: Blinkscout curveball ... exploring top WRs in the draft.

gatoramos83February 16, 2023 04:12PM

  Re: Blinkscout curveball ... exploring top WRs in the draft.

Ramstien49February 17, 2023 03:43AM