Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

I think it was a cost/benefit issue with him

April 04, 2022 04:40AM
Hekker had a really poor 2020. He did. And he wasn't very good the first half of 2021, really. But he did rebound and was good the rest of the way and through the postseason.

I think it became simply a cost-benefit issue with him. His cap number and percentage of team cap just was out of line with his contribution. He was, again, and is still good. But I don't think he is a top-3 punter anymore and he was being paid as a top guy. Their "team build," as Jourdan and others discuss, demands that they get an inexpensive punter again for a few years. And with the Draft deep at that spot the timing was right.

All the best to Hekker in Carolina.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Every move the Rams have made this offseason

BerendsenRam636April 02, 2022 09:10AM

  Re: Every move the Rams have made this offseason

SoCalRAMatic189April 03, 2022 03:41AM

  The Rams may draft Henderson's successor

ramzilla232April 03, 2022 09:00AM

  Re: The Rams may draft Henderson's successor

SoCalRAMatic188April 03, 2022 09:54AM

  probably not as good...

ramzilla155April 03, 2022 07:16PM

  Can't see Hekker as a loss at all....

JamesJM181April 03, 2022 12:18PM

  Re: Can't see Hekker as a loss at all....

george_allen175April 03, 2022 04:37PM

  Pffft. Had one bad year at 39.2 Attachments

JimYoungblood53155April 04, 2022 04:17AM

  I think it was a cost/benefit issue with him

LMU93115April 04, 2022 04:40AM

  In what matters he is--- Attachments

JimYoungblood53247April 04, 2022 04:54AM

  Re: In what matters he is---

LMU93222April 04, 2022 07:30AM

  He was good but not as good as he WAS

JimYoungblood53255April 04, 2022 12:04PM

  Re: He was good but not as good as he WAS

LMU93151April 06, 2022 04:23AM

  Re: He was good but not as good as he WAS

21Dog96April 06, 2022 04:58AM

  Re: He was good but not as good as he WAS

BerendsenRam182April 07, 2022 08:58AM