March 19, 2021 01:41PM
If you add a void year it's not 2 years. (And btw it looks like right now he DOES have a void year in 2023: [overthecap.com] ).

So anyway with that it's not 2 years. Right?

The point being that you don't end up with this big cap hit in 2022. So let's say it actually was just 2 years like we thought before, and they turned his 2021 roster bonus into a pro-rated bonus. That would make it 5 M per year in 2021 and 2022. Making the 2021 cap hit 15 M, but then making the 2022 cap hit 28 M.

Anyway even with a void year it's not that advantageous. Let's say that with the void year turned his roster bonus in 2021 into a pro-rated bonus, which would be 10 divided by 3 or about 3.33 M a year. That would make the 2021 cap hit 16.66 M, the 2022 cap hit 26.66 M, and the 2023 cap hit 3.33 M.

One way that gets improved is if you re-do the entire deal, make it 4 years, convert both roster bonuses from 2021 and 2022 into a pro-rated bonus, which would subtract 5 M each from both 2021 and 2022 (cap hits now being 15 M and then 18 M). (I don't know what it would be for 2023 and 2024, though you could make 2024 a void year too).

....



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 03/19/2021 01:57PM by zn.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Matthew Stafford on contract restructuring...

Rams43726March 19, 2021 10:13AM

  Rams can restructure him without his permission

RockRam414March 19, 2021 11:35AM

  Re: Rams can restructure him without his permission

Rams43430March 19, 2021 11:39AM

  Re: Rams can restructure him without his permission

LMU93265March 19, 2021 11:49AM

  Re: Rams can restructure him without his permission

SoCalRAMatic556March 19, 2021 11:51AM

  they can't, not really

zn517March 19, 2021 11:57AM

  I'll let Jourdon know that ZN says she's wrong.

RockRam304March 19, 2021 12:12PM

  while you're at it tell her RR does not have an argument

zn169March 19, 2021 01:44PM

  Re: while you're at it tell her RR does not have an argument

max262March 19, 2021 03:24PM

  Re: while you're at it tell her RR does not have an argument

dzrams238March 19, 2021 03:29PM

  dz look at the actual argument

zn457March 19, 2021 04:53PM

  Re: Here's what I was responding to....

dzrams138March 19, 2021 04:56PM

  well Football Outsiders calls adding voidable years extensions

zn209March 19, 2021 05:34PM

  Re: well Football Outsiders calls adding voidable years extensions

dzrams131March 19, 2021 05:49PM

  yeah cause people were arguing AGAINST that, right...

zn157March 19, 2021 05:55PM

  Re: If you weren't arguing AGAINST that, I don't see the point of your post...

dzrams138March 19, 2021 06:44PM

  I believe you don't see the point ...

zn248March 19, 2021 11:14PM

  Re: Actually they can....

dzrams465March 19, 2021 12:56PM

  so it's not 2 years

zn636March 19, 2021 01:41PM

  Queue Snoff - 4 yr 200mm Contract

BearlyThere242March 19, 2021 01:59PM

  Re: Queue Snoff - 4 yr 200mm Contract: Why not?

Anonymous User181March 19, 2021 05:47PM