Let's not do the "identity politics" or "cancel culture" routine on this board by using labels like "Rams' agent" for those of us who agree with what they did.
I agree in spades with their choice to acquire Stafford. In fact, on the 26th of January I posted that I thought this was the deal that had the best chance of being done. But I also have held their feet to the fire for taking Goff in the first place and then extending him in the second place only to have to replace him at great cost.
I call it as I see it. But I also know what it's like to be in the management seat when you have to be the one making the decisions and knowing that not every decision you make will everyone agree with..... or in hindsight was it the right one. In the end, it's a batting average.
I'll take McVay and Snead over anything we've had for the Rams in many years. Warts and all.
