Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: IMO Consistently trading off your 1st rd. picks..........

January 29, 2021 08:00AM
Two big things.

1. I can’t imagine Watson costing three 1sts. Maybe Goff, our 1st in ‘22 one of our 3rds this year, and a conditional ‘22 pick? The conditional pick could be a 1st through 3rd in a subsequent year.
Or throw in a player like Woods or Kupp instead of the conditional pick?

2. Yeah, there is a limit to how many truly elite players that the Rams can afford at any given time. If they pull this trade off they would have 3 of them simultaneously and probably for 4+ years at that since all 3 are in their prime and already on long contracts. I think 3 such players at the same time is doable but any more costing a 1st or multiple future 1sts might be a bridge too far. And perhaps even the 3 are only doable because of the exceptional drafting by the Rams lately.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  IMO Consistently trading off your 1st rd. picks..........

roman18294January 29, 2021 05:56AM

  Re: IMO Consistently trading off your 1st rd. picks..........

Rams43129January 29, 2021 08:00AM

  The Rams are the anti-NE model

NewMexicoRam129January 29, 2021 08:04AM

  Re: IMO Consistently trading off your 1st rd. picks..........

Ekern55141January 29, 2021 08:08AM

  Another huge point...

Rams43171January 29, 2021 08:13AM

  Agree - keep building for the long haul

promomasterj116January 29, 2021 08:17AM

  Re: Why didn't we get over the top?

dzrams105January 29, 2021 08:23AM

  Not sure this team is as good as 2018

promomasterj93January 29, 2021 08:27AM

  Re: Not sure this team is as good as 2018

dzrams91January 29, 2021 08:54AM