Quote
Classicalwit
If Cooks isn't, who is?
Kupp or Woods are much more capable of that role.
Though notice today what Dallas did--they took away Woods and forced him to find Cooks. Same thing the Patz did.
And to be honest I don't understand your question. In no way, shape, or form was it ever possible to argue that Cooks is a leading or #1 WR type, or anyway anyone who tried, it was simply not going to hold up.
From the get go, from day one, he was a Ram to play the deep threat role. He had more to his game than just that so he was never MERELY a deep threat, and when he was able to produce, had value (he's not the same now). But he absolutely was never a fully rounded, #1 WR type. Anyone who thought he was, was just off base.
....
