Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: uh the Rams

December 15, 2019 06:05PM
Quote
max
Quote
zn
Quote
max
Its hard to justify paying that much for a WR unless he is a WR1.

And you certainly don't give up a 1st round pick for a WR that isn't a WR1.

Its not just his size, Steve Smith wasn't big, but he played big.

Cooks plays small.

Again---look at 2nd contracts.

Every WR that came up Cooks year got more or less the same amount.

Rare, "best in the game" types get more. Guys like Cooks and Watkins got 16 M that year because that's what the 2nd contract market said they would get that year.

Anyone griping now, I will listen hard if they can link me to the post where they protested his contract when he signed it.

....

Its not about griping, its about what they expected to get for their investment. They invested a first round pick and a lot of cap space for a guy who could provide them with a deep threat but little more. It helped get them to the SB last year, so maybe it was worth it for the short term, but long term Cooks will probably be let go to save cap space as soon as they find a better replacement.

I have to be honest with you. I rarely if ever listen to fans about contracts. To me it's the worst kind of armchair GMing. Some of it is almost unreadable.

And Cooks always provided more than just a deep threat. He was never Avery or Givens. You paid him 16 M in 2018 or he walked and you wasted a pick.

This year though there is clearly something wrong with the guy, maybe even physically. That is what I am seeing. He's not holding up. He has not been the same since the last concussion.

And my position is, I never thought Cooks was all that. They signed him because they needed a guy in that role and Watkins didn't work out. I understood it--there were not a whole lot of other options. Till recently he was good in his role and did a lot more than simply go deep a la Avery or Givens.

Right now, though, I am not blaming this loss on him, I am not going to indulge in the blame the contract talk that comes up after losses, and I only hope whatever the issue is with Cooks, his situation improves.

....



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 12/15/2019 06:10PM by zn.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Cooks shows once again he is not a WR1

headslapper962December 15, 2019 03:06PM

  Re: Cooks shows once again he is not a WR1

chico n da rams419December 15, 2019 03:19PM

  Okay ... but... who ever thought he was?

zn448December 15, 2019 04:38PM

  uh the Rams

ferragamo79354December 15, 2019 04:41PM

  Re: uh the Rams

max308December 15, 2019 04:47PM

  Re: uh the Rams

zn276December 15, 2019 04:54PM

  Re: uh the Rams

max217December 15, 2019 05:00PM

  Re: uh the Rams

zn192December 15, 2019 06:05PM

  got the SB but

headslapper365December 15, 2019 07:09PM

  Re: got the SB but

zn177December 15, 2019 07:20PM

  Re: got the SB but

headslapper217December 15, 2019 07:23PM

  Re: got the SB but

headslapper203December 15, 2019 07:25PM

  Re: got the SB but

zn275December 15, 2019 08:46PM

  imo, zn, has pretty much put that argument to bed....

SunTzu_vs_Camus189December 16, 2019 12:39AM

  thing is they didnt have to acquire him

ferragamo79179December 16, 2019 08:06AM

  Re: Right. They had choices...

dzrams219December 16, 2019 08:17AM

  Cooks was a good trade and helped us become relevant again....

SunTzu_vs_Camus265December 16, 2019 08:40AM

  This is only his 2nd year with the Rams

ferragamo79168December 16, 2019 08:51AM

  Re: Cooks was a good trade and helped us become relevant again....

Classicalwit161December 16, 2019 09:32AM

  Re: Cooks was a good trade and helped us become relevant again....

zn161December 16, 2019 09:41AM

  Re: Cooks was a good trade and helped us become relevant again....

Classicalwit197December 16, 2019 11:32AM

  that's not what his contract says

zn238December 15, 2019 04:51PM

  Re: that's not what his contract says

waterfield185December 15, 2019 05:40PM

  Re: that's not what his contract says

zn197December 15, 2019 05:42PM

  Re: that's not what his contract says

waterfield183December 15, 2019 05:45PM

  Re: that's not what his contract says

zn175December 15, 2019 05:56PM

  Tyler Lockett

PHDram190December 15, 2019 05:40PM

  which is not a 2nd contract for a starting caliber guy or someone with that pedigree

zn270December 15, 2019 05:51PM

  Re: which is not a 2nd contract

PHDram175December 15, 2019 05:58PM

  you need to read better

zn195December 15, 2019 06:07PM

  So not all second contracts are the same

PHDram264December 15, 2019 09:54PM

  not really

zn176December 15, 2019 10:57PM

  Then

PHDram339December 16, 2019 02:52AM

  watkins was signed as WR1

headslapper184December 15, 2019 07:14PM

  Re: Okay ... but... who ever thought he was?

Classicalwit179December 15, 2019 06:12PM

  Re: Okay ... but... who ever thought he was?

zn185December 15, 2019 06:20PM

  Re: Okay ... but... who ever thought he was?

Classicalwit296December 15, 2019 06:40PM

  Re: Okay ... but... who ever thought he was?

zn209December 15, 2019 07:26PM

  Re: Okay ... but... who ever thought he was?

headslapper182December 15, 2019 07:32PM

  Re: Okay ... but... who ever thought he was?

zn163December 15, 2019 08:46PM

  Re: Okay ... but... who ever thought he was?

headslapper187December 15, 2019 07:36PM

  Re: Okay ... but... who ever thought he was?

zn277December 15, 2019 11:04PM

  Re: Okay ... but... who ever thought he was?

PHDram168December 16, 2019 08:51AM

  Re: Okay ... but... who ever thought he was?

Classicalwit164December 15, 2019 07:41PM

  Re: Okay ... but... who ever thought he was?

zn193December 15, 2019 08:55PM

  Re: Okay ... but... who ever thought he was?

Classicalwit176December 16, 2019 03:14AM

  Rams have to game plan for Kupp he is the bread and butter

Rams_81198December 16, 2019 04:01AM

  Re: Cooks has a unique skill set

Speed_Kills198December 16, 2019 08:21AM