Quote
Rams43
Quote
zn
Quote
Rampage2K-
remember when we couldn't find ONE WR since Holt left ?
Mark Clayton was good. He just got injured, is all.
Amendola was good. He was just confined to a specific role.
You’re reaching there, zn.
Both were nice WR’s, but neither compare in effectiveness to any one of this current trio, IMO.
Yes, Clayton compares to Woods.
Did you watch him?
They're actually very similar.
I don't know why people would underestimate him in retrospect---we knew better at the time.
And I speak as one of the few who said when they signed Woods that he had the makings of being a #1 WR, even though the circumstances in Buffalo kind of kept that low key.
In 2010 if he had played all 16 at the same rate Clayton would have had around 88 catches for around 1200 yards. That's with a rookie qb and a Shurmur ball control offense.
2010 would have been a better year if they had not lost him.
I don't know why you said I inflated Amendola when I said he was a role player. Slot guy in the mold of Welker, with 63 receptions in 2012 in spite of missing 5 games. He was good at that role.
I think in their prime either one would fit the 2018 offense.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 10/13/2018 12:39PM by zn.
