Use Woods for that
| October 13, 2018 05:19AM |
but I do get your point that there could be a customized role carved out so I am not dismissing your argument completely.
I believe those 3 (Cooks, Woods, Kupp) are all very good and they are already sharing between them. If they were other teams, they all could be "The Guy". All are top 30 WRs in the NFL and you want to keep feeding the beast.
On top of that, McVay has improved from last year on using them all in different roles instead of departmentizing the WR position by person. This has put the offense at another level of unpredictability.
I still am not in favor of Reynolds messing with that despite his catches on that one drive last week. I don't think it makes any sense to turn over the apple cart on one of the top offenses in the NFL, if not the very best. It is working so well right now. The approach, the personnel, the results.
And on another note, I have Kupp and Cooks on my fantasy team and that alone is enough to not put them on the bench on more snaps.
I believe those 3 (Cooks, Woods, Kupp) are all very good and they are already sharing between them. If they were other teams, they all could be "The Guy". All are top 30 WRs in the NFL and you want to keep feeding the beast.
On top of that, McVay has improved from last year on using them all in different roles instead of departmentizing the WR position by person. This has put the offense at another level of unpredictability.
I still am not in favor of Reynolds messing with that despite his catches on that one drive last week. I don't think it makes any sense to turn over the apple cart on one of the top offenses in the NFL, if not the very best. It is working so well right now. The approach, the personnel, the results.
And on another note, I have Kupp and Cooks on my fantasy team and that alone is enough to not put them on the bench on more snaps.
