Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Here's the article

April 14, 2018 09:53AM
LINK


When the Rams signed Tavon Austin to a four-year, $42 million extension in 2016, a lot of eyebrows were raised. He was coming off of his best season as a pro, hauling in 52 passes for 473 yards and five touchdowns, while also adding a career-high 434 yards rushing and four scores. And for the third straight year, he brought a punt return to the house, proving his value on special teams.

In hindsight, you can somewhat see why the Rams wanted to keep him around. However, upon further evaluation, extending him two years before he’d hit free agency was an unwise and costly decision.

Now, the Rams have other plans for No. 11.

After experimenting with him in the backfield, the Rams want to evaluate him as a true receiver, rather than simply an offensive weapon.

“I think the thing for Tavon is, even just thinking back to a year ago when we first got here as a coaching staff, we wanted to be able to evaluate Tavon as a receiver,” McVay said on ESPN Los Angeles. “We know he can take handoffs out of the backfield. We know he can do all of the jet sweeps and screens. But we want to see Tavon go into an offseason healthy and give him an opportunity to compete at the wide receiver position and demonstrate if he can provide some value there, where we can utilize him whether in the slot or outside.”


The Rams made a major change at wide receiver this offseason by replacing Sammy Watkins with Brandin Cooks. They’re both speedy wideouts with the ability to make big plays downfield, which is something the Rams had hoped Austin could be. Will 2018 be the year he finally puts it all together as a wide receiver? It’s possible, but given Los Angeles’ depth at the position, it’s unlikely.

McVay and the Rams are going to take it one step at a time with Austin, allowing him to compete for a larger role this offseason.

“I think really the goal for Tavon is let’s see how you approach and attack an offseason where you’re healthy and let’s try to fully develop you as a receiver detached from the core, whether that’s in the slot or outside. We’ll take it one day at a time from there,” McVay said.

If the Rams can’t make it work with Austin, it won’t cost them much. He redid his deal this offseason to convert $3 million of his $8 million cap hit into incentives, so he’ll likely count just $5 million against the cap in 2018.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Is WR group to Deep for Tavon Austin to stick on roster?

oldschoolramfan786April 13, 2018 10:27AM

  Not really

Speedball89307April 13, 2018 10:32AM

  will be traded during draft

ferragamo79292April 13, 2018 10:44AM

  Re: I thought I read someplace

shellback318April 13, 2018 10:47AM

  Re: might be interesting.......

leafnose282April 13, 2018 10:50AM

  Re: might be interesting.......

OzRam471April 13, 2018 11:05AM

  Re: I'm not sure man

Speed_Kills273April 13, 2018 10:49AM

  We all know who is going to pick TA up when we let him go...

PeoriaRa197April 15, 2018 10:53AM

  Tavon won’t make the 53 as a WR...

Rams43264April 13, 2018 11:36AM

  Hmmmm...no.

jemach276April 13, 2018 11:37AM

  Re: Hmmmm...no.

bigjimram21205April 13, 2018 08:42PM

  I think McVay is pretty clear

Atlantic Ram316April 13, 2018 12:34PM

  Re: I think McVay is pretty clear

zn254April 13, 2018 04:18PM

  Here's the article

Atlantic Ram249April 14, 2018 09:53AM

  Re: Here's the article...thanks (nm)

zn176April 14, 2018 10:37AM

  Even for a 7th

Blue and Gold219April 13, 2018 04:28PM

  I really think its too hard to tell

Atlantic Ram194April 14, 2018 10:00AM

  Misnomer

Blue and Gold194April 14, 2018 10:25AM

  I don't know

Atlantic Ram193April 14, 2018 05:31PM

  Re: I don't know

Blue and Gold177April 14, 2018 06:02PM

  Re: I don't know

zn202April 14, 2018 06:25PM

  I agree with that

zn211April 14, 2018 10:29AM

  Re: Even for a 7th

LMU93213April 14, 2018 12:44PM

  TA can break your back if you let him

Los Angeles Lenny258April 13, 2018 01:12PM

  Re: TA can break your back if you let him

Rams43215April 13, 2018 02:09PM

  Kupp for two reasons

Los Angeles Lenny239April 13, 2018 02:22PM

  Re: Kupp for two reasons

Rams43281April 13, 2018 02:37PM

  43 I would sit Kupp

Los Angeles Lenny216April 13, 2018 02:45PM

  Re: 43 I would sit Kupp

Rams43281April 13, 2018 07:39PM

  Re: 43 I would sit Kupp

Los Angeles Lenny226April 13, 2018 10:45PM

  I am sorry 43, I was playing fantasy somehow I thought you were reading my mind and thinking "in a perfect world"

Los Angeles Lenny205April 14, 2018 06:53PM

  Re: I am sorry 43, I was playing fantasy somehow I thought you were reading my mind and thinking "in a perfect world"

Rams43195April 15, 2018 07:15AM

  Re: 43 I would sit Kupp

bigjimram21211April 13, 2018 08:49PM

  Re: Is WR group to Deep for Tavon Austin to stick on roster?

David Deacon212April 13, 2018 01:47PM

  Austin is the 4th best WR playmaker

Rams_81395April 13, 2018 05:07PM

  Just a hunch, TA gets traded on draft day

six2stack268April 13, 2018 07:12PM

  Re: Just a hunch, TA gets traded on draft day

oldschoolramfan364April 13, 2018 07:20PM

  Wish is were possible

David Deacon336April 14, 2018 03:25AM

  Re: Austin is the 4th best WR playmaker...Obsession?

oldschoolramfan215April 13, 2018 07:30PM

  Re: Austin is the 4th best WR playmaker...Obsession?

zn194April 14, 2018 07:58AM

  Re: Austin is the 4th best WR playmaker...Obsession?

oldschoolramfan188April 14, 2018 08:08AM

  Re: Austin is the 4th best WR playmaker...Obsession?

zn190April 14, 2018 08:46AM

  Re: zn.....Would you take TA over a young DE/LB?

oldschoolramfan184April 14, 2018 11:59AM

  Re: zn.....Would you take TA over a young DE/LB?

zn292April 14, 2018 12:21PM

  Re: Austin is the 4th best WR playmaker

Los Angeles Lenny207April 13, 2018 10:39PM

  Why would a LBer take him in space when he's in motion

Blue and Gold214April 14, 2018 09:06AM

  purely wishful thinking

Los Angeles Lenny184April 14, 2018 06:40PM

  It would be nice if Austin could be a player

Blue and Gold350April 14, 2018 06:53PM

  totally agree

Los Angeles Lenny178April 14, 2018 07:00PM

  Nope!

reggae281April 15, 2018 11:03AM

  If they weren't going to trade him, why the restructure?

ferragamo79216April 14, 2018 11:19AM

  Re: If they weren't going to trade him, why the restructure?

shellback254April 14, 2018 11:39AM

  the contract before the restructure

shellback248April 14, 2018 11:41AM

  Re: Here's another thought...

dzrams229April 14, 2018 12:52PM

  cool...thx

ferragamo79270April 14, 2018 05:45PM