Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

One last time

March 14, 2018 02:59PM
Quote
dzrams
I'm not seeing the lack of 3.5 tackles behind the line of scrimmage being a significant thing.

My opinion - which I believe was backed by PFF - says there was no drop off in run D. If anything, he's getting better.

Bottom line for me on AD is, 2017 was his most dominant season to date despite the scheme change, the missed time, and the rusty getting up to speed period.

That's my opinion and I'm sticking to it. At this point, we really should agree to disagree.

Wade would throw Suh in there - like he did Ethan Westbrooks who btw also had no NT experience - and he would dominate, fit or not. Why? Because he's a great player.
.

It's not the difference of 3.5, for every stuff there are near misses that maybe someone else gets or that end up a no gain (not a stuff) so the drop of in DOnald's stuffs spread through the defense, your top guy drops, the defense also drops.

From 2012-16 Rams averaged 60 stuffs a season, last year HALF that. Not all on Donald but some of it is,

Year — Stuffs
2012 — 59
2013 — 60
2014 — 50
2015 — 65
2016 — 60
2017 — 33

in 2015-16 Rams averaged 3.97 yards a rush against. In 2017 it was 4.68. So there WAS a dropoff and Donald's run defense was part of that.

Next,. PFF does not track the things you say they do. Do you even subscribe? The do a -2. -1. 0, 1, 2 scoring system and then they take the score on run plays and divide by the number of run plays and get a percentage. Same with pass plays. So you are wrong PFF does not capture what you say it does

As far as Suh, and your quote "'he's never lined up anywhere else but 3-tech' narrative."

Suh has never been a dedicated 3-tech. He's played both shade and 3-tech and where the defense calls for. I am beginning to wonder if you know what a 3-tech is. That is okay, but it would help in terms of this conversation.

As far as Westbrook and your statement "Ethan Westbrooks who btw also had no NT experience" is false. He backed up Brockers in 2015. Wade moved him there because he had experience playing NT. Here is a still.


I always say stats are not the only thing, however, they do mean something. Like Watkins and the most important stat= 8 TDs. With Donald there is something there. In 2015 he made 69 tackles and 13.5 stuffs plus 11 sacks, in 2017 he had 41 tackles and 6.5 stuffs and 11 sacks. The defense held opponents to 4 yards a rush, in 2017 it was closer to 5.

Suh is not coming to LA, so it does not matter. But he's not someone Wade could plug in and play NT and get NT-type things from. That's not his game. You wouldn't play Dr J at power forward, either. Could he stand in and play there? Sure, but he would not be the Dr J who was a dominant small forward. Same with Suh at NT between Donald and Brockers


But just look at the difference in tackles between 2015 and 2017. He averaged 12 stuffs a year before and in 2017 it was 6.5 and if you prorate for the 2 missed games it jumps to 7.5, His run defense, for whatever reason, lacked the big plays he had made in the past so your contention that he's getting better versus the run just isn't borne out by the numbers or the film.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 03/14/2018 03:01PM by Blue and Gold.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Maybe Suh not a terrible idea?

spagsbacker1087March 13, 2018 03:48PM

  Re: Maybe Suh not a terrible idea?

Classicalwit385March 13, 2018 03:56PM

  Wait...that was my post!

jemach369March 13, 2018 04:06PM

  Re: It will be a "Sign both" move.......Donald and Suh.

oldschoolramfan226March 19, 2018 05:30AM

  One can only hope...

jemach520March 19, 2018 05:34AM

  terrible idea, does not fit scheme

Blue and Gold353March 13, 2018 04:19PM

  Re: terrible idea, does not fit scheme

dzrams268March 13, 2018 04:43PM

  I said playing him as a 3-4 DE would be disaster

Blue and Gold587March 13, 2018 05:42PM

  Re: That ain't all you said bro....

dzrams272March 13, 2018 06:39PM

  And Donald wasn't a 10-sack, 10-stuff guy Attachments

Blue and Gold376March 13, 2018 06:51PM

  Re: If that's all you were focused on fine...

dzrams216March 13, 2018 07:05PM

  Do you see anything other than sacks and stuffs?.

Blue and Gold240March 13, 2018 07:12PM

  Based on what?

Blue and Gold265March 13, 2018 05:44PM

  Re: Based on what?

bigjimram21237March 13, 2018 06:10PM

  No reason to force anything

Blue and Gold238March 13, 2018 06:14PM

  Re: it's definitely not as foolish a thought as you say...

spagsbacker298March 14, 2018 12:29AM

  Aside from Dickerson lobbying for it what else is there?

Blue and Gold202March 14, 2018 12:40AM

  Re: Based on what?

dzrams240March 13, 2018 06:40PM

  No, it wasn't

Blue and Gold227March 13, 2018 06:57PM

  Re: It should have been, it was only 4 lines

dzrams240March 13, 2018 07:10PM

  Well, "better than ever" is an opinion I don't share

Blue and Gold237March 13, 2018 07:16PM

  Re: That's fair...I don't mind you having a different opinion...

dzrams379March 13, 2018 07:25PM

  Of course, anyone can be wrong

Blue and Gold226March 13, 2018 07:39PM

  Re: Of course, anyone can be wrong

dzrams248March 13, 2018 08:23PM

  Then why were his stuffs down?

Blue and Gold215March 13, 2018 08:52PM

  Re: Over a full season, who cares...

dzrams428March 13, 2018 09:45PM

  One last time Attachments

Blue and Gold215March 14, 2018 02:59PM

  Re: I responded to this last night, and both got deleted...Let's agree to disagree

dzrams172March 14, 2018 03:16PM

  I didn't see it

Blue and Gold168March 14, 2018 03:36PM

  Re: I know...that's b/c they both got deleted... Lol

dzrams224March 14, 2018 03:57PM

  That's fine

Blue and Gold228March 14, 2018 04:02PM

  hey B&G...a question....bout NT in Wade's defense....

SunTzu_vs_Camus289March 13, 2018 10:45PM

  No, a nose tackle in the base defense does not have

Blue and Gold324March 13, 2018 11:08PM

  interesting...thnx B&G

SunTzu_vs_Camus360March 13, 2018 11:17PM

  I think the times we were gashed

Blue and Gold245March 13, 2018 11:28PM

  it's only from stuff I read bout his rosters along with the guys you posted about....

SunTzu_vs_Camus360March 13, 2018 11:33PM

  Our LBs weren't physical enough...

jemach170March 14, 2018 05:01PM

  My observation was they got wired to blockers

Blue and Gold212March 14, 2018 06:43PM

  Zine It !!!

RamsFanSince69197March 14, 2018 05:20AM

  Re: definitely NOT a terrible idea...

spagsbacker298March 14, 2018 12:42AM

  No

Blue and Gold278March 14, 2018 10:58AM

  Re: Maybe you need to give Snead a lesson?

spagsbacker224March 19, 2018 04:40AM

  C'mon man...

jemach230March 19, 2018 04:49AM

  Re: C'mon man...

spagsbacker225March 19, 2018 04:56AM

  I think signing Suh...

jemach201March 19, 2018 05:08AM

  Re: You're missing the point...

dzrams232March 19, 2018 05:34AM

  Go back to initial response...

jemach203March 19, 2018 05:41AM

  Re: Still missing the point...

dzrams216March 19, 2018 06:07AM

  Apparantly I misunderstood that "spare me" comment...

jemach187March 19, 2018 06:40AM

  Re: Thanks DZ...

spagsbacker203March 19, 2018 05:49AM

  Re:Question my fine feathered friend......

laram175March 19, 2018 06:12AM

  Re: Re:Question my fine feathered friend......

dzrams210March 19, 2018 07:40AM

  Re: Last hooray....

laram223March 19, 2018 08:00AM

  And in another thread I said I would ADMIT

Blue and Gold198March 19, 2018 12:15PM

  You really think Wade would OK Suh if he didn't have a plan for him?

RamBum242March 19, 2018 04:51AM

  Fantastic dialogue in this thread

no name208March 19, 2018 07:49AM

  the problem with him is his ill timing penalties

Rams_81223March 19, 2018 07:52AM