Quote
RockRam
Simply repeating the mantra that he does more more things and is a better receiver is not evidence, let alone proof, that he is.
You have no objective evidence because there isn't any. His measurable performance simply doesn't warrant the big bucks. And to pretend that the numbers don't matter? Of course they matter. The numbers are there as the only objective means to measure performance.

And you pretend that film review does not matter. Of course it matters.

Facts are what shows up on film. How he runs routes, how he gets open, how he doesn't drop passes— all those things. Those things are objective and they are evidence.

Numbers in the case of Watkins do not matter TO THE DEGREE you contend, they are not objective and do not measure his performance IN TOTO.

Statheads will be proven wrong in terms of Watkins.