at CB you have Peters and Hill and no one else. NR-C and Tru are FAs and Webster may never be right again. And even if he is, it isn't week 1.
IMO, and this is just my opinion, there isn't a LT worth the pick @23 (assuming they still have #23) unless you want to draft 1 and replace Havs with the thought of grooming him to replace Whit in a few years.
Same story with TE. Its a tough position to walk into in year 1 and be a stud and secondly, my top rated TE is a 2nd rounder. Trade back into the 2nd, then sure look at a TE.
I think the top 2 DTs (NTs) are gone, so unless you want to draft Taven Bryan to be a DE and move Brockers back to nose, the DL is off the table.
Quinn is coming back if you believe the reports that said no to including him in the Peters trade. So they could still use a OLB opposite Quinn, but I'm not sure the value is there. I like OLB in the 3rd or 4th from a value perspective.
ILB? Only if they cut Barron. SO for no I would say no.
QB or WR or RB? No. Even if TA is cut and Watkins is gone via FA, I am not drafting a WR in round 1.
S - not with JJ3 or Joyner (he is not escaping LA unlike Snake Plissken)
That leaves CB and possibly a C/G like Billy Price.
A CB like Mike Hughes makes perfect sense. He is a little raw, but is extremely athletic. He fits as a press corner with ball skills, but too raw to step in right away as a true #1. Peters gives him a chance to grow for a few years ad when (I mean if) Peters doesn't work out, he hopefully slides in to the top spot.
Don't waste your time looking back, you're not going that way. - Ragnar Lothbrok
