Quote
max
Quote
zn
Quote
max
If we never saw the tapes, then we cannot be sure about what was on them.
We then are just taking the word of the NFL office. I don’t believe anything unless I see it myself.
WHAT could be on them?
They violated rules prohibiting videotaping. All you need to prove that is an illegally made videotape.
What other rules would be involved? What other things could be on the tapes?
No one ever answers those questions. Instead they honestly propose that
illegal tapes of teams's signals be made public, already a double problem, to supposedly investigate things which are never named and presumably OTHER violated rules never identified.
....
I don’t draw definitive conclusions on evidence that I never saw.
And that makes perfect sense to me.
You rarely if ever see the evidence for anything outside your own domain.
Therefore it's not a criteria for the rest of us.
Basically what you're saying is, I have no idea what I think I am looking for, but, prove to me it doesn't exist.
Which would entail making public something illegal which shows the offensive and defensive signals of various teams, which is not supposed to be public.
McDaniels had a tape too, it showed a SF walk through before the Denver/SF London game.
Prove to me that;s all it was.
Can't? Good. I don;t care.