Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

100% Agree

August 21, 2017 08:58AM
It's not that AD isn't the best DT in the game and deserves to be paid as such. It's that you don't build the team that you want by making a DT the highest paid player in the game, ESPECIALLY in a 3-4 defense. He needs to play or be traded.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 08/21/2017 08:59AM by R4M.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Donald wants opt out clause, I'm hearing

max1774August 21, 2017 01:56AM

  Agreed and that clause is probably the Agent's doing

GreatRamNTheSky527August 21, 2017 02:05AM

  Re: They should be in all professional sports contracts.

Billy_T431August 21, 2017 05:00AM

  Here's THE clause the Rams should offer!!!!

Ramgator368August 21, 2017 02:17PM

  What is it with great Defensive Players from Pitt?

chunkmeister419August 21, 2017 10:32AM

  Re: Donald wants opt out clause, I'm hearing

~lyser540August 21, 2017 02:43AM

  A sad reality: AD will never be a Ram for life.

RockRam520August 21, 2017 03:12AM

  At this point, that sounds like the most reasonable approach

NewMexicoRam443August 21, 2017 03:25AM

  Re: This is the subject of the 2021 strike

dzrams499August 21, 2017 07:47AM

  Re: This is the subject of the 2021 strike

bigjimram21313August 21, 2017 11:01AM

  Re: This is the subject of the 2021 strike

AlbaNY_Ram382August 21, 2017 06:21PM

  I agree with this more than anything else I have read on this subject

PeoriaRa329August 21, 2017 11:26AM

  Trade him for a kings randsom

Los Angeles Lenny339August 21, 2017 05:54PM

  Re: Trade him for a kings randsom

Hollywood Ram329August 21, 2017 06:04PM

  Re: Trade him for a kings randsom

dzrams337August 21, 2017 06:14PM

  Re: Trade him for a kings randsom

Hollywood Ram309August 22, 2017 01:51PM

  Re: Ok I get you...there's a simple fix...

dzrams297August 22, 2017 02:32PM

  Re: Trade him for a kings randsom

Los Angeles Lenny329August 21, 2017 06:16PM

  Re: Trade him for a kings randsom

no name302August 22, 2017 02:00PM

  Re: Donald wants opt out clause, I'm hearing

RFIP400August 21, 2017 03:35AM

  The thought for some time is that the issue is structure, not the money

RockRam486August 21, 2017 03:42AM

  that can also mean

zn498August 21, 2017 03:58AM

  Could be

max400August 21, 2017 04:16AM

  Re: Could be

zn853August 21, 2017 04:32AM

  Re: Could be

max348August 21, 2017 04:52AM

  Rams shouldn't pay $20 mil per year for ANY DT including Donald.

RockRam419August 21, 2017 04:34AM

  and

zn528August 21, 2017 04:39AM

  That's not denying the market.

RockRam362August 21, 2017 05:01AM

  yes it is

zn331August 21, 2017 05:06AM

  No rule saying what position? Of course there is.

RockRam434August 21, 2017 05:13AM

  need to read the post rock

zn346August 21, 2017 05:24AM

  Re: need to read the post rock

Hollywood Ram318August 22, 2017 01:54PM

  Re: need to read the post rock

zn283August 22, 2017 02:23PM

  "the market" decided no such thing

CeeZar346August 22, 2017 02:51PM

  Re: "the market" decided no such thing

zn330August 22, 2017 03:05PM

  Re: "the market" decided no such thing

21Dog310August 22, 2017 07:30PM

  Re: "the market" decided no such thing

zn362August 22, 2017 07:56PM

  Yes, and the market is set not only by those willing to pay...

Saguaro564August 21, 2017 05:39AM

  It should ALWAYS begin with the value of the position, not the player

RockRam344August 21, 2017 07:15AM

  Disagree

Suh-weet!328August 21, 2017 09:37AM

  Re: One example doesn't prove your point...NM

laram309August 21, 2017 09:39AM

  Actually, it does (nm)

Suh-weet!314August 21, 2017 11:30AM

  yes there are many examples of that

zn375August 21, 2017 10:38AM

  Re: The position is elite pass rusher...

dzrams336August 21, 2017 09:55AM

  to me it's this

zn383August 21, 2017 10:28AM

  Re: Yep...all good points

dzrams364August 21, 2017 10:37AM

  Absolutley

RAMSINCE ARNETT307August 21, 2017 10:47AM

  Re: Its not...

laram374August 21, 2017 10:52AM

  Re: Its not...

dzrams331August 21, 2017 11:30AM

  NO...

Suh-weet!386August 21, 2017 11:47AM

  Re: NO...

zn324August 22, 2017 06:33AM

  Re: yes it is

bigjimram21346August 21, 2017 11:16AM

  Re: yes it is

zn385August 21, 2017 08:04PM

  Re: yes it is

bigjimram21293August 22, 2017 06:47PM

  100% Agree

R4M632August 21, 2017 08:58AM

  Re: and

Rams43356August 21, 2017 05:12AM

  Re: and

GarlicExile329August 21, 2017 06:25AM

  Re: NFL teams see it differently...

dzrams364August 21, 2017 08:03AM

  Re: Think about that for a minute...

laram349August 21, 2017 08:18AM

  Re: Think about that for a minute...

dzrams505August 21, 2017 08:33AM

  Re: I think it has to do with the evolution of the game..

laram318August 21, 2017 08:48AM

  Re: Haha... I suspected you may have an answer

dzrams378August 21, 2017 08:53AM

  Re: that can also mean

bigjimram21307August 21, 2017 11:06AM

  opting

wv ram450August 21, 2017 04:12AM

  Re: opting

AlbaNY_Ram393August 21, 2017 04:25AM

  Re: opting

zn428August 21, 2017 04:28AM

  Re: opting

AlbaNY_Ram334August 21, 2017 04:39AM

  Re: opting

zn322August 21, 2017 04:43AM

  Re: opting

AlbaNY_Ram660August 21, 2017 04:47AM

  I agreed with you

zn321August 21, 2017 04:51AM

  Interesting point

max297August 21, 2017 04:57AM

  it';s already the case

zn322August 21, 2017 05:03AM

  To me.....

NewMexicoRam335August 21, 2017 09:02AM

  Re: opting

BeachBoy311August 22, 2017 01:17AM

  Can you tag a player who opts out?

AlbaNY_Ram421August 21, 2017 04:41AM

  Re: Can you tag a player who opts out?

zn412August 21, 2017 04:44AM

  Re: Can you tag a player who opts out?

bigjimram21306August 21, 2017 11:26AM

  Opting out is not in the CBA

snowman415August 21, 2017 08:13AM

  Re: It's possible...

dzrams353August 21, 2017 09:10AM

  Opting Out Has Cap Implications

RamsFanSince69438August 21, 2017 09:02AM

  Re: Opting Out Has Cap Implications

zn399August 21, 2017 10:31AM

  Re: Opting Out Has Cap Implications

snowman422August 21, 2017 10:48AM

  Re: Opting Out Has Cap Implications

AlbaNY_Ram308August 21, 2017 06:41PM

  Is it finally time for the Rams to play hardball???

Rampage2K-379August 21, 2017 02:04PM

  Re: Is it finally time for the Rams to play hardball???

max363August 21, 2017 02:27PM

  Re: Is it finally time for the Rams to play hardball???

Rampage2K-305August 21, 2017 03:44PM

  Re: Donald wouldn't hold out again...

dzrams345August 21, 2017 06:18PM

  great points

Los Angeles Lenny357August 21, 2017 06:43PM

  IMO...

jemach303August 21, 2017 03:56PM

  Re: Donald wants opt out clause, I'm hearing

no name349August 21, 2017 06:16PM

  Re: Donald wants opt out clause, I'm hearing

dzrams342August 21, 2017 07:28PM

  Yes.

no name281August 22, 2017 10:47AM

  How is that different than holding out 3 years from now?

Atlantic Ram351August 21, 2017 07:08PM

  Its worse!

stlramz364August 21, 2017 08:06PM

  According to Schefter he's ready to hold out 7 games

max439August 22, 2017 02:33PM

  sorry deleted double post (nm)

zn311August 22, 2017 03:10PM

  Re: According to Schefter he's ready to hold out 7 games

max342August 22, 2017 03:14PM

  Re: According to Schefter he's ready to hold out 7 games

zn393August 22, 2017 03:12PM

  Re: According to Schefter he's ready to hold out 7 games

CarolinaRam378August 22, 2017 03:14PM

  If we could get 2-#1 picks for him...

SunTzu_vs_Camus346August 22, 2017 04:04PM

  and instantly the defense will be pedestrian at best

max368August 22, 2017 04:39PM

  Re: and instantly the defense will be pedestrian at best

Rams43328August 22, 2017 05:09PM

  Re: and instantly the defense will be pedestrian at best

dzrams397August 22, 2017 05:12PM

  Re: and instantly the defense will be pedestrian at best

Rams43333August 22, 2017 06:26PM

  Re: LOL...we have differing definitions of stud

dzrams320August 22, 2017 06:37PM

  Re: LOL...we have differing definitions of stud

Rams43329August 22, 2017 08:00PM

  Re: LOL...we have differing definitions of stud

dzrams318August 22, 2017 08:31PM

  Re: LOL...we have differing definitions of stud

Rams43309August 23, 2017 05:49AM

  Re: LOL...we have differing definitions of stud

dzrams299August 23, 2017 07:19AM

  Re: LOL...we have differing definitions of stud

zn373August 23, 2017 06:11AM

  Re: LOL...we have differing definitions of stud

Rams43281August 23, 2017 06:50AM

  sum of the parts kinda thing....

SunTzu_vs_Camus279August 23, 2017 08:49AM

  Re: sum of the parts kinda thing....

Rams43300August 23, 2017 08:58AM

  Re: sum of the parts kinda thing....

zn297August 23, 2017 09:16AM

  Re: If we could get 2-#1 picks for him...

AlbaNY_Ram279August 23, 2017 07:52AM

  Re: Not happening...

dzrams277August 23, 2017 07:57AM

  would JJ Watt be worth 2 #1s?

SunTzu_vs_Camus430August 23, 2017 08:31AM

  Re: would JJ Watt be worth 2 #1s?

dzrams319August 23, 2017 08:41AM

  I don't know bout that....

SunTzu_vs_Camus318August 23, 2017 08:56AM

  Re: I don't know bout that....

dzrams295August 23, 2017 09:08AM

  I would think the Raiders....

RAMbler356August 23, 2017 08:40AM

  Re: I would think the Raiders....

Rams43273August 23, 2017 08:49AM

  Re: I would think the Raiders....

RAMbler289August 23, 2017 09:31AM

  Re: My bottom lime for Donald.........

oldschoolramfan372August 23, 2017 06:46AM

  deal AD to the Browns for their next 2 #1s

SunTzu_vs_Camus327August 23, 2017 08:34AM