Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

100% Agree

August 21, 2017 08:58AM
It's not that AD isn't the best DT in the game and deserves to be paid as such. It's that you don't build the team that you want by making a DT the highest paid player in the game, ESPECIALLY in a 3-4 defense. He needs to play or be traded.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 08/21/2017 08:59AM by R4M.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Donald wants opt out clause, I'm hearing

max1916August 21, 2017 01:56AM

  Agreed and that clause is probably the Agent's doing

GreatRamNTheSky562August 21, 2017 02:05AM

  Re: They should be in all professional sports contracts.

Billy_T459August 21, 2017 05:00AM

  Here's THE clause the Rams should offer!!!!

Ramgator400August 21, 2017 02:17PM

  What is it with great Defensive Players from Pitt?

chunkmeister477August 21, 2017 10:32AM

  Re: Donald wants opt out clause, I'm hearing

~lyser619August 21, 2017 02:43AM

  A sad reality: AD will never be a Ram for life.

RockRam548August 21, 2017 03:12AM

  At this point, that sounds like the most reasonable approach

NewMexicoRam476August 21, 2017 03:25AM

  Re: This is the subject of the 2021 strike

dzrams647August 21, 2017 07:47AM

  Re: This is the subject of the 2021 strike

bigjimram21346August 21, 2017 11:01AM

  Re: This is the subject of the 2021 strike

AlbaNY_Ram414August 21, 2017 06:21PM

  I agree with this more than anything else I have read on this subject

PeoriaRa363August 21, 2017 11:26AM

  Trade him for a kings randsom

Los Angeles Lenny374August 21, 2017 05:54PM

  Re: Trade him for a kings randsom

Hollywood Ram362August 21, 2017 06:04PM

  Re: Trade him for a kings randsom

dzrams370August 21, 2017 06:14PM

  Re: Trade him for a kings randsom

Hollywood Ram342August 22, 2017 01:51PM

  Re: Ok I get you...there's a simple fix...

dzrams325August 22, 2017 02:32PM

  Re: Trade him for a kings randsom

Los Angeles Lenny361August 21, 2017 06:16PM

  Re: Trade him for a kings randsom

no name332August 22, 2017 02:00PM

  Re: Donald wants opt out clause, I'm hearing

RFIP437August 21, 2017 03:35AM

  The thought for some time is that the issue is structure, not the money

RockRam536August 21, 2017 03:42AM

  that can also mean

zn530August 21, 2017 03:58AM

  Could be

max433August 21, 2017 04:16AM

  Re: Could be

zn943August 21, 2017 04:32AM

  Re: Could be

max385August 21, 2017 04:52AM

  Rams shouldn't pay $20 mil per year for ANY DT including Donald.

RockRam452August 21, 2017 04:34AM

  and

zn663August 21, 2017 04:39AM

  That's not denying the market.

RockRam394August 21, 2017 05:01AM

  yes it is

zn362August 21, 2017 05:06AM

  No rule saying what position? Of course there is.

RockRam493August 21, 2017 05:13AM

  need to read the post rock

zn373August 21, 2017 05:24AM

  Re: need to read the post rock

Hollywood Ram347August 22, 2017 01:54PM

  Re: need to read the post rock

zn315August 22, 2017 02:23PM

  "the market" decided no such thing

CeeZar376August 22, 2017 02:51PM

  Re: "the market" decided no such thing

zn360August 22, 2017 03:05PM

  Re: "the market" decided no such thing

21Dog337August 22, 2017 07:30PM

  Re: "the market" decided no such thing

zn397August 22, 2017 07:56PM

  Yes, and the market is set not only by those willing to pay...

Saguaro602August 21, 2017 05:39AM

  It should ALWAYS begin with the value of the position, not the player

RockRam377August 21, 2017 07:15AM

  Disagree

Suh-weet!360August 21, 2017 09:37AM

  Re: One example doesn't prove your point...NM

laram340August 21, 2017 09:39AM

  Actually, it does (nm)

Suh-weet!347August 21, 2017 11:30AM

  yes there are many examples of that

zn414August 21, 2017 10:38AM

  Re: The position is elite pass rusher...

dzrams370August 21, 2017 09:55AM

  to me it's this

zn413August 21, 2017 10:28AM

  Re: Yep...all good points

dzrams398August 21, 2017 10:37AM

  Absolutley

RAMSINCE ARNETT340August 21, 2017 10:47AM

  Re: Its not...

laram405August 21, 2017 10:52AM

  Re: Its not...

dzrams360August 21, 2017 11:30AM

  NO...

Suh-weet!550August 21, 2017 11:47AM

  Re: NO...

zn357August 22, 2017 06:33AM

  Re: yes it is

bigjimram21376August 21, 2017 11:16AM

  Re: yes it is

zn414August 21, 2017 08:04PM

  Re: yes it is

bigjimram21320August 22, 2017 06:47PM

  100% Agree

R4M680August 21, 2017 08:58AM

  Re: and

Rams43386August 21, 2017 05:12AM

  Re: and

GarlicExile363August 21, 2017 06:25AM

  Re: NFL teams see it differently...

dzrams399August 21, 2017 08:03AM

  Re: Think about that for a minute...

laram384August 21, 2017 08:18AM

  Re: Think about that for a minute...

dzrams536August 21, 2017 08:33AM

  Re: I think it has to do with the evolution of the game..

laram350August 21, 2017 08:48AM

  Re: Haha... I suspected you may have an answer

dzrams410August 21, 2017 08:53AM

  Re: that can also mean

bigjimram21340August 21, 2017 11:06AM

  opting

wv ram481August 21, 2017 04:12AM

  Re: opting

AlbaNY_Ram427August 21, 2017 04:25AM

  Re: opting

zn502August 21, 2017 04:28AM

  Re: opting

AlbaNY_Ram371August 21, 2017 04:39AM

  Re: opting

zn353August 21, 2017 04:43AM

  Re: opting

AlbaNY_Ram746August 21, 2017 04:47AM

  I agreed with you

zn356August 21, 2017 04:51AM

  Interesting point

max329August 21, 2017 04:57AM

  it';s already the case

zn352August 21, 2017 05:03AM

  To me.....

NewMexicoRam370August 21, 2017 09:02AM

  Re: opting

BeachBoy339August 22, 2017 01:17AM

  Can you tag a player who opts out?

AlbaNY_Ram454August 21, 2017 04:41AM

  Re: Can you tag a player who opts out?

zn446August 21, 2017 04:44AM

  Re: Can you tag a player who opts out?

bigjimram21339August 21, 2017 11:26AM

  Opting out is not in the CBA

snowman446August 21, 2017 08:13AM

  Re: It's possible...

dzrams388August 21, 2017 09:10AM

  Opting Out Has Cap Implications

RamsFanSince69465August 21, 2017 09:02AM

  Re: Opting Out Has Cap Implications

zn430August 21, 2017 10:31AM

  Re: Opting Out Has Cap Implications

snowman453August 21, 2017 10:48AM

  Re: Opting Out Has Cap Implications

AlbaNY_Ram338August 21, 2017 06:41PM

  Is it finally time for the Rams to play hardball???

Rampage2K-416August 21, 2017 02:04PM

  Re: Is it finally time for the Rams to play hardball???

max392August 21, 2017 02:27PM

  Re: Is it finally time for the Rams to play hardball???

Rampage2K-338August 21, 2017 03:44PM

  Re: Donald wouldn't hold out again...

dzrams376August 21, 2017 06:18PM

  great points

Los Angeles Lenny475August 21, 2017 06:43PM

  IMO...

jemach337August 21, 2017 03:56PM

  Re: Donald wants opt out clause, I'm hearing

no name383August 21, 2017 06:16PM

  Re: Donald wants opt out clause, I'm hearing

dzrams375August 21, 2017 07:28PM

  Yes.

no name313August 22, 2017 10:47AM

  How is that different than holding out 3 years from now?

Atlantic Ram383August 21, 2017 07:08PM

  Its worse!

stlramz396August 21, 2017 08:06PM

  According to Schefter he's ready to hold out 7 games

max473August 22, 2017 02:33PM

  sorry deleted double post (nm)

zn342August 22, 2017 03:10PM

  Re: According to Schefter he's ready to hold out 7 games

max372August 22, 2017 03:14PM

  Re: According to Schefter he's ready to hold out 7 games

zn427August 22, 2017 03:12PM

  Re: According to Schefter he's ready to hold out 7 games

CarolinaRam408August 22, 2017 03:14PM

  If we could get 2-#1 picks for him...

SunTzu_vs_Camus383August 22, 2017 04:04PM

  and instantly the defense will be pedestrian at best

max410August 22, 2017 04:39PM

  Re: and instantly the defense will be pedestrian at best

Rams43359August 22, 2017 05:09PM

  Re: and instantly the defense will be pedestrian at best

dzrams432August 22, 2017 05:12PM

  Re: and instantly the defense will be pedestrian at best

Rams43365August 22, 2017 06:26PM

  Re: LOL...we have differing definitions of stud

dzrams354August 22, 2017 06:37PM

  Re: LOL...we have differing definitions of stud

Rams43362August 22, 2017 08:00PM

  Re: LOL...we have differing definitions of stud

dzrams347August 22, 2017 08:31PM

  Re: LOL...we have differing definitions of stud

Rams43343August 23, 2017 05:49AM

  Re: LOL...we have differing definitions of stud

dzrams335August 23, 2017 07:19AM

  Re: LOL...we have differing definitions of stud

zn405August 23, 2017 06:11AM

  Re: LOL...we have differing definitions of stud

Rams43314August 23, 2017 06:50AM

  sum of the parts kinda thing....

SunTzu_vs_Camus312August 23, 2017 08:49AM

  Re: sum of the parts kinda thing....

Rams43333August 23, 2017 08:58AM

  Re: sum of the parts kinda thing....

zn329August 23, 2017 09:16AM

  Re: If we could get 2-#1 picks for him...

AlbaNY_Ram310August 23, 2017 07:52AM

  Re: Not happening...

dzrams307August 23, 2017 07:57AM

  would JJ Watt be worth 2 #1s?

SunTzu_vs_Camus465August 23, 2017 08:31AM

  Re: would JJ Watt be worth 2 #1s?

dzrams347August 23, 2017 08:41AM

  I don't know bout that....

SunTzu_vs_Camus349August 23, 2017 08:56AM

  Re: I don't know bout that....

dzrams327August 23, 2017 09:08AM

  I would think the Raiders....

RAMbler387August 23, 2017 08:40AM

  Re: I would think the Raiders....

Rams43303August 23, 2017 08:49AM

  Re: I would think the Raiders....

RAMbler320August 23, 2017 09:31AM

  Re: My bottom lime for Donald.........

oldschoolramfan402August 23, 2017 06:46AM

  deal AD to the Browns for their next 2 #1s

SunTzu_vs_Camus362August 23, 2017 08:34AM