June 21, 2017 04:35AM
Vegas puts the number at 5.5 at the four sites I checked. Vegas is in the business of making money on their opinion and if you bet the over you would collect if the Rams win 6 games and lose if the Rams win 5. To be honest that would make me a bit nervous.

Using PFFs line (4 wins) you would collect at 5 wins and wouldn't lose your money unless the Rams won 3 or fewer. If I could get that line at a betting site I'd be all over it.

And the cut your loses philosophy doesn't apply. If you bet the over on 4 wins last year it would have been a push. (If it was me I'd roll that money towards an 'over 4' bet this year, and probably double or triple it in the process.)



AlbaNY_Ram
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Rams get zero love from PFF. They see Rams at 4 wins.

max779June 20, 2017 11:29AM

  who cares

PHDram295June 20, 2017 11:41AM

  Huh. They did predict LA going 4-12 though

ArizonaRamFan315June 20, 2017 05:47PM

  Re: Rams get zero love from PFF. They see Rams at 4 wins.

stlramz320June 20, 2017 12:19PM

  Rams will get respect when they earn it

promomasterj285June 20, 2017 02:29PM

  I'll take the over!

AlbaNY_Ram270June 20, 2017 05:52PM

  An excellent example of why to take PFF wih a grain of salt...

Rams43310June 20, 2017 06:29PM

  Would you have taken the over for 4 wins last year for a substantial wager?

max274June 21, 2017 04:11AM

  I'd have taken it last year.

ArizonaRamFan222June 21, 2017 04:12AM

  Re: Would you have taken the over for 4 wins last year for a substantial wager?

AlbaNY_Ram240June 21, 2017 04:35AM

  Re: Would you have taken the over for 4 wins last year for a substantial wager?

Rams43229June 21, 2017 06:50AM

  16-0

wv ram249June 21, 2017 04:57AM

  4 is too low

RFIP249June 21, 2017 06:24AM

  Similar, except I think 9 (not 8) is too high

ArizonaRamFan255June 21, 2017 06:44AM

  Nine is NOT too high...

Rams43232June 21, 2017 07:00AM

  Love is blind

max229June 21, 2017 07:09AM

  This thread is going to be embarrassing to revisit....nm

RFIP359June 21, 2017 07:13AM

  Re: This thread is going to be embarrassing to revisit....nm

Rams43239June 21, 2017 07:17AM

  Re: This thread is going to be embarrassing to revisit....nm

RFIP226June 21, 2017 07:32AM

  Re: This thread is going to be embarrassing to revisit....nm

Rams43258June 21, 2017 07:50AM

  No not totally

RFIP234June 21, 2017 08:25AM

  Agreed.

ArizonaRamFan218June 21, 2017 09:20AM

  The positive signs are still there. And I AM being positive.

ArizonaRamFan246June 21, 2017 09:17AM

  Re: The positive signs are still there. And I AM being positive.

Rams43228June 21, 2017 10:53AM

  Because everything MUST go right and nothing go wrong

ArizonaRamFan250June 21, 2017 11:08AM

  Here's the way I look at it....

max245June 21, 2017 11:09AM

  I see 6 as the floor and 9 as the ceiling

LMU93246June 21, 2017 07:39AM

  Totally legit till the Rams prove otherwise.

Ramgator227June 21, 2017 07:51AM

  Re: Totally legit till the Rams prove otherwise.

CROMWELL21224June 21, 2017 08:29AM