Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: I would arrive at that conclusion as well..

June 20, 2017 11:11AM
Quote
laram
Quote
zn
Quote
dzrams
I know how you view the DT position. That’s fine; I respect that. I don’t think NFL powers that be view it the same way.

Great left tackles may be hard to come by but that doesn’t negate the fact that DTs are the 3rd highest paid position. You look at the first two highest paid positions of QB and DE and it’s obvious why. Clearly NFL GMs value QBs and DEs as they should. But now you’re trying to tell me that they don’t value DTs the 3rd highest but for some reason choose to pay them at that level anyway? That doesn’t pass the smell test.

Moreover, economics 101 disproves your theory. The first law of economics is supply and demand. When something is in great supply, the price and value of it will increase. If DTs are sooooo easy to find, then the supply is plentiful. That would have a downward effect on their salaries. But the reality is, their salaries are much higher than LTs. This means that either they are not much easier to find (not in greater supply) OR the demand for them is much higher than it is for LTs.

You mention trends. I believe the modern trend of high powered offenses is why the DT position is so highly paid now. The NFL is desperate for pass rushers. Other than QB, people who rush the passer are considered the most valuable commodity in the game.

And FWIW, here’s the answer to your question of number of Pro Bowl LTs on new contracts versus Pro Bowl DTs. It’s even.

LT Pro Bowlers, Under 30, Recent Contracts

Trent Williams – $13.6 mil.
Russell Okung – $13.25 mil.
Terron Armstead – $13 mil.
Tyron Smith – $12.2 mil.
David Bakhtiari –$12 mil. – Pro Bowl and All Pro in 2016

Average: $12.81 mil.

All of these LTs are pro bowlers, under 30, and have all signed contracts in the last few years. I left Joe Thomas, Andrew Whitworth, Jason Peters, Branden Albert, Duane Brown, and Joe Staley off the list because they are over 30 and past their prime. The contracts they recently signed reflect that.

DT Pro Bowlers, Under 30, Recent Contracts

Ndamukong Suh - $19.0625 mil.
Fletcher Cox - $17.1 mil.
Kawann Short - $16.1 mil.
Marcell Dareus - $16.095686 mil.
Gerald McCoy - $15.866667 mil.

Average: $16.84 mil.

All of these DTs are pro bowlers, under 30, and have all signed contracts in the last few years. I left Haloti Ngata and Kyle Williams off the list because they are over 30 and past their prime. I left Geno Atkins and Linval Joseph off the list because they have not signed recent contracts.


You have 5 pro bowl LTs with new contracts versus 5 pro bowl DTs with new contracts. The number of new contracts doesn't favor the DTs at all. And yet the DT salaries are nearly 33% higher. That’s a huge difference.

Interestingly, just in terms of caliber of player, I would say the LOT list you give here is higher overall quality than the DT list you give here. This tells me DTs are getting overpaid...just by a bit but still. What that in turn tells me is that TOP DTs are harder to find, at least comparatively.

One thing that might back that...make a list of A to A- level LOTs. Guys you would take, regardless of age, if you you had to start a team and wanted an LOT.

Then do the same thing with DT.

My bet is that the LOT list would be longer.

....

Plus I would look at the success of the LT's teams vs the DT's team and I believe there is no contest.

Like I said trends come and go in the NFL...IMO this perceived DT craze is a trend.

Give me a stud LT anyday.

But I don't look at it as either/or.

More teams can find a quality LOT (who isn't as important to Kromer anyway) than can find a Donald.

Rams are aiming at being a team that can do both.

And no I don't regard either one as,. by themselves, a key to success. Otherwise Trent Willians, Joe Thomas, and Jason Peters would have been on more winning teams than they actually have been.

Meanwhile the last 5 superbowl winners the starting LOTs were Nate Solder, Ryan Harris, Okung, McKinnie, and Will Beatty/David Diehl.

A team can work around/.work with having just a pretty good or decent LOT.

When you have an elite DT, it's the OTHER team that has to find a way to work around that.

In terms of admiring elite DTs, btw, my own interest goes way back. To the likes of Olsen, Page, Greene, Sapp, Randle, Lilly, Klecko, and that type. I don't personally regard that interest as a fad thing.

...

....

,..,.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 06/20/2017 11:16AM by zn.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  In terms of draft success, does GRob busting outweigh Donald’s success?

dzrams1107June 15, 2017 07:17AM

  Re: In terms of draft success, does GRob busting outweigh Donald’s success?

Rams43376June 15, 2017 07:31AM

  Exactly - not. even. close.

Suh-weet!316June 17, 2017 11:50AM

  Re: In terms of draft success, does GRob busting outweigh Donald’s success?

AlbaNY_Ram384June 15, 2017 07:40AM

  Re: In terms of draft success, does GRob busting outweigh Donald’s success?

RamsFanSinceLA333June 15, 2017 08:04AM

  posters don't understand the question.

max368June 15, 2017 08:07AM

  Re: posters don't understand the question.

dzrams365June 15, 2017 08:46AM

  you think its simple. but others misread it. nm

max295June 17, 2017 08:25AM

  Re: you think its simple. but others misread it. nm

CraigMatson402June 17, 2017 09:07AM

  I think just a decent player would have been a good result at #2.

max337June 17, 2017 09:16AM

  Re: I think just a decent player would have been a good result at #2.

CraigMatson370June 17, 2017 09:26AM

  Re: posters don't understand the question.

CraigMatson249June 17, 2017 07:43AM

  Re: posters don't understand the question.

dzrams311June 19, 2017 03:03PM

  Re: In terms of draft success, does GRob busting outweigh Donald’s success?

govane314June 15, 2017 08:10AM

  Yes

FootballGenius514June 15, 2017 08:14AM

  Re: In terms of draft success, does GRob busting outweigh Donald’s success?

zn337June 17, 2017 05:41AM

  Here was my criteria in answering the question.

Saguaro354June 17, 2017 05:56AM

  Re: Here was my criteria in answering the question.

dzrams400June 19, 2017 03:24PM

  Thanks, dz. I enjoyed it.

Saguaro282June 19, 2017 05:44PM

  Re: That is a skewed perception IMO...

laram277June 20, 2017 04:38AM

  Re: The numbers don't back that...

dzrams416June 20, 2017 08:59AM

  Re: The numbers don't back that...

zn313June 20, 2017 09:08AM

  Re: I would arrive at that conclusion as well..

laram322June 20, 2017 09:39AM

  Re: I would arrive at that conclusion as well..

zn315June 20, 2017 11:11AM

  Re: I would arrive at that conclusion as well..

laram313June 20, 2017 11:15AM

  Re: I would arrive at that conclusion as well..

zn303June 20, 2017 11:19AM

  thats a good post dz

LesBaker286June 20, 2017 02:40PM

  This is a nonsensical question

LesBaker387June 17, 2017 06:03AM

  As of now, 38 people...

L.A.Rams343June 17, 2017 06:30AM

  Re: As of now, 38 people out of 1,565 Registered Users

Ramadune435June 17, 2017 09:00AM

  As of now 61 votes

L.A.Rams410June 17, 2017 05:49PM

  Re: This is a nonsensical question - Agreed

Ramadune414June 17, 2017 09:02AM

  Lol, Les.

Saguaro321June 17, 2017 01:56PM

  But

LesBaker311June 17, 2017 03:17PM

  Yep, that's how I think most respondents see it.

Saguaro368June 17, 2017 05:40PM

  Re: In terms of draft success, does GRob busting outweigh Donald’s success?

CraigMatson326June 17, 2017 07:17AM

  Re: In terms of draft success, does GRob busting outweigh Donald’s success?

BeachBoy359June 19, 2017 02:28AM

  The reason NO is the #2 pick

Rams_81472June 19, 2017 03:20AM

  Your reply is why I think the poll results may be inaccurate.

Saguaro450June 19, 2017 05:03AM

  Glad you pointed that out

Rams_81368June 19, 2017 09:14AM

  Guilty as charged

RamsFanSinceLA425June 19, 2017 12:14PM

  Re: Guilty as charged

Rams43316June 19, 2017 12:29PM

  Re: Guilty as charged

RamsFanSinceLA315June 19, 2017 01:29PM

  Re: The reason NO is the #2 pick

zn348June 19, 2017 05:29AM

  Re: The reason NO is the #2 pick

Rams43337June 19, 2017 07:28AM

  Did he touch the ball or rush the passer

Rams_81372June 19, 2017 09:12AM

  Re: Did he touch the ball or rush the passer

Rams43306June 19, 2017 09:43AM

  Re: Did he touch the ball or rush the passer

ramBRO467June 19, 2017 10:10AM

  Re: The reason NO is the #2 pick

Rampage2K-414June 19, 2017 10:11PM