Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

I once did some numbers

April 24, 2017 04:07PM
Quote
RamBill
If you take Charley Casserly's numbers on the percentage of players drafted by round who become successful in the NFL....with Successful defined as a player developing into a starter within four years of being drafted.” ....roughly 70% of players drafted are NOT successful. That number could vary by year and you could quibble with his definition, but an overwhelming majority of drafted players are unsuccessful EVERY year.

Bill Polian has said that the very best GM's get it right a little more than 50% of the time.

So every "draft expert" is wrong A LOT of the time. People should be a lot more forgiving about others being "wrong" about a draft evaluation. I've often thought that the top characteristic of an NFL draft evaluator should be humility.

Actually if a draft expert wanted to be most accurate by percentage they should predict every single player as being a bust. In reality they would be correct the majority of the time every single year. spin tounge smiley

I picked a few well-regarded drafting teams. I covered a 6 or 7 year period that stopped 3 years before. So for example if I did that now, I would go back to 2007 but the last year would be 2013 so I could have some idea how the players panned out.

What I found was that good drafting teams got hits just around 42-46% of the time. I regarded 50% or more as exceptional. Average was around the mid-30s to 40.

...



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 04/24/2017 04:08PM by zn.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Engram at #37 is unlikely.......

Rampage2K-953April 24, 2017 01:47PM

  These TV draft gurus don't get it right very often.

RockRam438April 24, 2017 01:57PM

  Re: These TV draft gurus don't get it right very often.

bigjimram21275April 24, 2017 02:05PM

  Re: These TV draft gurus don't get it right very often.

Rampage2K-334April 24, 2017 02:14PM

  Who Does Get it Right?

RamBill307April 24, 2017 03:19PM

  This is some great information

PHDram439April 24, 2017 03:57PM

  Here are Casserly's Numbers

RamBill292April 24, 2017 04:15PM

  3rd and 4th round about same

Blue and Gold296April 24, 2017 04:17PM

  Re: 3rd and 4th round about same

RamBill327April 24, 2017 04:36PM

  Even more difficult...

PHDram240April 25, 2017 04:00AM

  Re: First Rounders lasting 4 years is a success......

oldschoolramfan322April 25, 2017 05:59AM

  I once did some numbers

zn352April 24, 2017 04:07PM

  Not sure what your number represents.

RockRam266April 25, 2017 06:27AM

  Re: Not sure what your number represents.

zn297April 25, 2017 04:16PM

  Agree. But stats show the higher the pick the MORE it is right.

RockRam211April 25, 2017 06:19AM

  It'll be close.

alyoshamucci315April 24, 2017 04:12PM

  Re: It'll be close.

LMU93372April 25, 2017 04:04AM

  Re: It'll be close......Agree.

oldschoolramfan242April 25, 2017 06:40AM

  Re: Dominik should know better

merlin295April 25, 2017 11:08AM

  Re: Dominik should know better

Rampage2K-318April 25, 2017 04:52PM

  Re: that would make more sense

merlin267April 25, 2017 06:34PM

  well I've soured on Shuster

reggae273April 25, 2017 04:26PM

  Re: Engram at #37 is unlikely.......

spamlord270April 27, 2017 02:58PM