we excuse way too many things. We see things through rose colored glasses when their is mud all over the windshield.
I'm saying that in the Vermeil/Martz days, the critique was much more objective and thorough.
On the positive side, I do think the draft evaluations provided by those who do such things has continued to get better and better.
I see rational posted here excusing performance, personnel moves, draft picks, etc. that makes me scratch my head and wonder.
I'm not saying I know it all. I'm saying that I think losing has degraded the quality of analysis.
