Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Judge rules in favor of refund or tickets to PSL holders in St. Louis

September 23, 2016 03:44PM
What I heard on the local news is there were two different sellers of PSL's, the Rams, and later Fans inc. I understood the difference is those PSL's sold by the Rams are the ones that are still owned by those who bought from the Rams.

Fans inc. PSL's were sold under a different set of rules, those are the ones the judge said owners will get refunds. The PSL's sold by the Rams apparently are still owned by those PSL owners, and can be used to purchase tickets in LA, or sold to any buyer without any remuneration to the Rams.

Of course this is all still to be decided even though a judge has decided. I'm sure the losing party (Rams) will appeal.

If the present PSL owners do prevail, it'd probably be better (if a person can do it financially) to hold on to it until Kroenke-Land is completed. Just like the owner of the Rams did with the move, the value of a PSL will end up maybe 10x, probably more.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Judge rules in favor of refund or tickets to PSL holders in St. Louis

leafnose856September 23, 2016 03:26AM

  I'm not a lawyer, but......

Rampage2K-407September 23, 2016 08:08AM

  No clause in the lease was broken

LesBaker437September 23, 2016 08:40AM

  I thought what triggered the out clause

Kind of Blue/Gold370September 23, 2016 11:31AM

  Re: I thought what triggered the out clause

Rampage2K-453September 23, 2016 11:36AM

  No they declined it isn't spin

LesBaker427September 23, 2016 11:54AM

  Re: No they declined it isn't spin

Rampage2K-402September 23, 2016 12:02PM

  Re: No they declined it isn't spin

zn402September 23, 2016 12:06PM

  Re: No they declined it isn't spin

Rampage2K-375September 23, 2016 12:12PM

  Re: No they declined it isn't spin

zn493September 23, 2016 12:17PM

  Re: No they declined it isn't spin

Rampage2K-493September 23, 2016 12:27PM

  Re: No they declined it isn't spin

zn388September 23, 2016 01:14PM

  Re: No they declined it isn't spin

waterfield383September 23, 2016 01:38PM

  Re: No they declined it isn't spin

Rampage2K-392September 23, 2016 02:23PM

  Re: No they declined it isn't spin

zn349September 23, 2016 02:42PM

  How can you assure that?

ArizonaRamFan366September 23, 2016 02:45PM

  Re: How can you assure that?

zn350September 23, 2016 02:58PM

  Re: How can you assure that?

waterfield372September 23, 2016 10:00PM

  Re: How can you assure that?

Rampage2K-372September 23, 2016 10:26PM

  Re: How can you assure that?

zn365September 24, 2016 03:13AM

  yes Rampage, there were guys on both sides of this move

ArizonaRamFan357September 23, 2016 02:42PM

  People have the right to their emotions

9er8er232September 25, 2016 08:27AM

  Re: People have the right to their emotions

Bud Frosty278September 25, 2016 08:38AM

  Re: No they declined it isn't spin

BobCarl355September 24, 2016 09:08PM

  Good post.

Drew2839389September 24, 2016 06:35AM

  Re: Good post.

leafnose303September 24, 2016 09:17AM

  The contract stated that the sole remedy for Rams was relocation.

ArizonaRamFan387September 23, 2016 01:45PM

  Re: The contract stated that the sole remedy for Rams was relocation.

zn348September 23, 2016 02:02PM

  Re: No they declined it isn't spin

reggae368September 24, 2016 04:50PM

  It is 100% spin

9er8er258September 25, 2016 07:33AM

  Re: Judge rules in favor of refund or tickets to PSL holders in St. Louis

Bud Frosty353September 23, 2016 03:44PM

  Re: Judge rules in favor of refund or tickets to PSL holders in St. Louis

reggae382September 23, 2016 08:34PM

  Re: Judge rules in favor of refund or tickets to PSL holders in St. Louis

wik407September 24, 2016 01:27PM