Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

I'm not a lawyer, but......

September 23, 2016 08:08AM
I'm pretty sure this ruling will be appealed and eventually overturned...

Although I feel their pain and frustration, trust me, this seems to be a money grab by lawyers.

It seems the language in the PSL's contract stipulated that those rights were only for the EJD.

The RSA and CVC broke their agreement in the terrible lease they signed 22 years ago, perhaps they should sue them.

Here is a paragraph from an article in Forbes magazine back in January

"As a resident of St. Louis since 1999, I have seen progress within the city. But as a sports economist, I understand where the Rams are coming from both financially and legally.

Many today are citing the greed and disloyalty of Stan Kroenke as the culprit behind why St. Louis may be on the cusp of losing their second (and potentially last) NFL franchise.

But the real culprit is the lease created and signed by local authorities over 20 years ago, because its language and requirements are why Kroenke enjoys the financial and legal leverage with the St. Louis region he has."



[www.instagram.com]
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Judge rules in favor of refund or tickets to PSL holders in St. Louis

leafnose856September 23, 2016 03:26AM

  I'm not a lawyer, but......

Rampage2K-406September 23, 2016 08:08AM

  No clause in the lease was broken

LesBaker437September 23, 2016 08:40AM

  I thought what triggered the out clause

Kind of Blue/Gold370September 23, 2016 11:31AM

  Re: I thought what triggered the out clause

Rampage2K-453September 23, 2016 11:36AM

  No they declined it isn't spin

LesBaker427September 23, 2016 11:54AM

  Re: No they declined it isn't spin

Rampage2K-402September 23, 2016 12:02PM

  Re: No they declined it isn't spin

zn402September 23, 2016 12:06PM

  Re: No they declined it isn't spin

Rampage2K-375September 23, 2016 12:12PM

  Re: No they declined it isn't spin

zn493September 23, 2016 12:17PM

  Re: No they declined it isn't spin

Rampage2K-493September 23, 2016 12:27PM

  Re: No they declined it isn't spin

zn387September 23, 2016 01:14PM

  Re: No they declined it isn't spin

waterfield383September 23, 2016 01:38PM

  Re: No they declined it isn't spin

Rampage2K-391September 23, 2016 02:23PM

  Re: No they declined it isn't spin

zn348September 23, 2016 02:42PM

  How can you assure that?

ArizonaRamFan366September 23, 2016 02:45PM

  Re: How can you assure that?

zn350September 23, 2016 02:58PM

  Re: How can you assure that?

waterfield372September 23, 2016 10:00PM

  Re: How can you assure that?

Rampage2K-372September 23, 2016 10:26PM

  Re: How can you assure that?

zn365September 24, 2016 03:13AM

  yes Rampage, there were guys on both sides of this move

ArizonaRamFan357September 23, 2016 02:42PM

  People have the right to their emotions

9er8er231September 25, 2016 08:27AM

  Re: People have the right to their emotions

Bud Frosty278September 25, 2016 08:38AM

  Re: No they declined it isn't spin

BobCarl355September 24, 2016 09:08PM

  Good post.

Drew2839389September 24, 2016 06:35AM

  Re: Good post.

leafnose303September 24, 2016 09:17AM

  The contract stated that the sole remedy for Rams was relocation.

ArizonaRamFan387September 23, 2016 01:45PM

  Re: The contract stated that the sole remedy for Rams was relocation.

zn348September 23, 2016 02:02PM

  Re: No they declined it isn't spin

reggae368September 24, 2016 04:50PM

  It is 100% spin

9er8er258September 25, 2016 07:33AM

  Re: Judge rules in favor of refund or tickets to PSL holders in St. Louis

Bud Frosty353September 23, 2016 03:44PM

  Re: Judge rules in favor of refund or tickets to PSL holders in St. Louis

reggae382September 23, 2016 08:34PM

  Re: Judge rules in favor of refund or tickets to PSL holders in St. Louis

wik406September 24, 2016 01:27PM