Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Fisher's plan.

September 22, 2016 06:23AM
The Keenum versus Goff thing has gone round and round. But what I think gets lost in the debate is Fisher's plan. Many here don't want to remember what our HC has told us. Instead it's pitchfork time and everyone who has ever worked for the Rams should be fired. Or Keenum is horrible because of this or this or that. The Niners game was a flat out embarrassment and I checked the garage for the whereabouts of my torch and pitchfork too. But, after many deep breathes I asked what was Fisher's plan because that obviously and conclusively did not work. Fisher has tirelessly stated he would play Goff when ready. So, unless you claim he is a big fat liar, Goff is not ready. And despite that, with a starting QB many here ridicules even with a winning record as a starter for our Rams we somehow beat the Seahawks. That was quite an accomplishment. First of all, the Seahawks usually win. Their QB has started his career with an unprecedented winning record, win a SB and was a yard from another. We are 1-1. Tied for first place. Undefeated at home. Keen I'm is at .500 this year and still has a winning record for our team. Do I like everything Fisher does? Heck no. Do I like what Boras has called? Double heck no!! Would O extend anyone? No Frigging way. I have waited a long time for the Rams to be good again. I like our D, our ST, TG and Goff. The kid now knows where the sun sets. Maybe he'll learn that if he sees the entire D lined up to kill him he'll know how to throw a quick slant. I think we'll be very excited when we see Goff join in. I'm anxious for that day, but I'll wait until Fisher deems him ready.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Fisher's plan.

SoCalRAMatic805September 22, 2016 06:23AM

  Fisher did say Goff would start sooner...

max540September 22, 2016 06:35AM

  Re: Fisher did say Goff would start sooner...

LesBaker432September 22, 2016 06:43AM

  Exactly right.

Suh-weet!402September 22, 2016 07:44AM

  Re: Exactly right.

SoCalRAMatic372September 22, 2016 08:00AM

  No and yes

Suh-weet!372September 22, 2016 09:14AM

  Re: Fisher did say Goff would start sooner...

max337September 22, 2016 09:16AM

  Re: Fisher did say Goff would start sooner...

dzrams394September 22, 2016 08:31AM

  Re: Fisher did say Goff would start sooner...

Rampage2K-472September 22, 2016 08:39AM

  i do find it amusing that

PHDram396September 22, 2016 08:53AM

  Re: Fisher expected Goff to start week 1...

govane442September 22, 2016 09:24AM

  Nice find. That clears up what "sooner" means.

max499September 22, 2016 09:44AM

  Re: Nice find. That clears up what "sooner" means.

Rampage2K-381September 22, 2016 10:00AM

  I totally disagree.

max341September 22, 2016 10:03AM

  Re: I totally disagree.

Rampage2K-355September 22, 2016 10:12AM

  Re: Nice find. That clears up what "sooner" means.

bigjimram21354September 22, 2016 10:32AM

  Re: Nice find. That clears up what "sooner" means.

dzrams423September 22, 2016 10:07AM

  Re: Nice find. That clears up what "sooner" means.

SoCalRAMatic417September 22, 2016 10:08AM

  lol jt?

PHDram398September 22, 2016 10:35AM

  Here... I cleared up what "sooner" means.

Rampage2K-363September 22, 2016 10:36AM

  It's a bit of a stretch IMO

LesBaker373September 22, 2016 12:29PM

  Re: Fisher's plan.

Rampage2K-430September 22, 2016 08:51AM