Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

He was referencing the fans patience

September 16, 2016 07:20AM
And that they have to win quickly or fans will stop supporting them. When he was saying that the conversation was that the Rams needed to win to maintain support.

Here's the thing 43, meaning my earlier post in this thread that you responded to.

First off who really thinks that LA fans support a winning team better than other cities support a winning team? Especially cities where a team is massively supported even when they aren't winning.

It's totally fabricated, and it's senseless. He pretty much said they aren't really good fans, but they are great when the team is winning. But other teams have fans that are fans win or lose. He compared LA fans to fans in a couple of other cities and said they come up short. But give them glitz and glam and wins and they come out in droves.

Not really a smooth move for a guy who is close to the team.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Rams know honeymoon period won't last in L.A., they've 'got to win

RamBill612September 16, 2016 04:37AM

  Wow earth shattering news

GreatRamNTheSky320September 16, 2016 04:40AM

  Could do without the Dickerson tongue analogy nm

CROMWELL21292September 16, 2016 06:39AM

  It was misogynistic IMO and he also insulted fans

LesBaker331September 16, 2016 06:54AM

  Re: It was misogynistic IMO and he also insulted fans

Rams43258September 16, 2016 07:01AM

  He's right, look at the Kings and Lakers

merlin414September 16, 2016 11:24AM

  In Other News: Warren Buffet Knows "Buy Low, Sell Hi"

canuckramsfans344September 16, 2016 11:29AM

  A puzzling Dickerson comment...

Rams43394September 16, 2016 06:55AM

  Re: I think he was talking about time.

Billy_T428September 16, 2016 07:04AM

  Maybe not so puzzling...

L.A.Rams460September 16, 2016 07:16AM

  He was referencing the fans patience

LesBaker359September 16, 2016 07:20AM