September 04, 2016 08:33AM
The obvious question is whether the dividends are for the next coach, of course, if Keenum isn't as good as the staff hopes.

But that aside, I like what Fisher has tried to do with the position...

1. Brought in a guy who runs a QB school. A guy who had proven results with NFL QBs that think highly of his teaching.
2. Finally invested draft capital last year in the OL so the position coach has enough to work with.
3. After failing to attract a top OC talent he went with another young guy in Groh who had actual results to be his passing game coord.
4. Moved up to get a QB that has everything he wants.

Fish takes a lot of hits by Rams fans. And many of them he does deserve. But the dude is trying, and this roster looks like it finally has enough pieces to be a power run scheme with just enough passing game complements. Goff is going to be a great QB, I was shocked when they moved up for him and I'm still ecstatic they made that move. But Fish needs to win now and I understand that, and while the WR group is still sad the question is whether the top of the roster can get 'er done and buy him more time for this program overall to grow into something greater.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  LA TIMES: quarterbacks aren't being taught well enough

BobCarl1039September 04, 2016 04:33AM

  Re: LA TIMES: quarterbacks aren't being taught well enough

EastRam554September 04, 2016 05:31AM

  Re: Agree........Both of you hit the nail on the head.

oldschoolramfan487September 04, 2016 06:31AM

  This is why the Rams' current approach might pay big dividends

merlin476September 04, 2016 08:33AM

  Re: This is why the Rams' current approach might pay big dividends

BobCarl362September 04, 2016 08:40AM

  Rams' current approach might pay big dividends: Merlin, merlin

Anonymous User408September 04, 2016 10:31AM

  the college game is setting these kids back....

Rampage2K-394September 04, 2016 09:18AM

  Re: the college game is setting these kids back....

RFL315September 04, 2016 10:45AM

  "back" from what?....

waterfield382September 04, 2016 02:44PM

  Re: "back" from what?....

Rampage2K-346September 04, 2016 03:47PM

  Huh?

GreatRamNTheSky432September 05, 2016 06:51AM