August 17, 2016 07:23AM
Quote
RockRam
Going by his history with the Rams, I think what we'll see is:

DBs 10 Gaines, Hill, Roberson, Tru J, Joyner, Alexander, McDonald, Davis, Sensebaugh, ?
LBs 6 Forest, Hagen, Lynch, Akers, Ogletree, Barron
DLs 8 Longacre, Westbrooks, Sims, Hayes, Thomas, Brockers, Donald, Quinn

QBs 3 Goff, Keenum, Mannion
RBs 4 Gurley, Cunningham, Brown, Reynolds
TE's 3 Harkey, Higbee, Kendricks
WRs 6 Britt, Austin, Spruce, Cooper, Marquez, Smith
OL 10 GRob, Saffold, Barnes, Brown, Havenstein, Williams, Reynolds, Wichman, Battle, Rhaney

STs 3 Hekker, GZ, McQuaid

Granted, if there is a player that is just too good not to keep, we could see some numbers shuffling.

Well...

In the spirit that we're all agreed that this is clearly premature and that this is just for a fun exercise, I will play.

And I'm gonna use candidate play vs Cowboys for any tiebreakers.

I have the following different takes...

DB. I would include Bryant at S. And Sensabaugh might be vulnerable at CB based on that Cowboy game. Probably not, but Hill, Washington, and Jordan have impressed more, IMO.

DL. Delete Thomas. Add Easley and Coples. Seau probably goes to PS.

RB. This is the end of the trail for Chase Reynolds, I'm afraid. Green makes it as our 4th RB and on ST.

TE. They might go with 4 here. Stoneburner? Hemingway to PS? I just dunno.

WR. Britt, Austin, Spruce, and Cooper look like locks. After that it's a tough, tough call. But based on the Cowboy game, I lean toward Williams and McRoberts. Tough cuts for Thomas and Marquez.

OL. This one is very, very difficult. Firstly, they may go with only 9, not 10. And Rhaney is out and Kush is in. If they go with only 9, Battle is probably going to PS.

I agree with all the rest.

Mind you, this could all be turned upside down by future camp reports and preseason game play. Particularly at OL, WR, TE, CB, and S.

But like I said, it's just a strictly fun exercise for right now.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Not likely to keep 9 DL.

RockRam1294August 16, 2016 02:12PM

  Re: Not likely to keep 9 DL.

LMU93493August 16, 2016 02:22PM

  10th OL... due to Saffold

Atlantic Ram444August 16, 2016 05:42PM

  A question ...if you are rotational...

jemach394August 17, 2016 07:23PM

  Re: Only 8 is highly unlikely

dzrams504August 16, 2016 03:01PM

  who is Smith WR?

ferragamo79458August 16, 2016 07:19PM

  Re: Not likely to keep 9 DL.

TonyHunter87439August 16, 2016 11:22PM

  no Coples or Easley???

SunTzu_vs_Camus433August 17, 2016 06:35AM

  Re: no Coples or Easley???

BC Ramsfan511August 17, 2016 10:32AM

  Re: Not likely to keep 9 DL.

Rams43378August 17, 2016 07:23AM

  Re: Not likely to keep 9 DL.

dzrams457August 17, 2016 07:48AM

  Re: Not likely to keep 9 DL.

Rams43447August 17, 2016 08:44AM

  Re: Not likely to keep 9 DL.

dzrams464August 17, 2016 09:52AM