August 17, 2016 07:23AM | Registered: 11 years ago Posts: 36,122 Status: HOF Inductee |
Quote
RockRam
Going by his history with the Rams, I think what we'll see is:
DBs 10 Gaines, Hill, Roberson, Tru J, Joyner, Alexander, McDonald, Davis, Sensebaugh, ?
LBs 6 Forest, Hagen, Lynch, Akers, Ogletree, Barron
DLs 8 Longacre, Westbrooks, Sims, Hayes, Thomas, Brockers, Donald, Quinn
QBs 3 Goff, Keenum, Mannion
RBs 4 Gurley, Cunningham, Brown, Reynolds
TE's 3 Harkey, Higbee, Kendricks
WRs 6 Britt, Austin, Spruce, Cooper, Marquez, Smith
OL 10 GRob, Saffold, Barnes, Brown, Havenstein, Williams, Reynolds, Wichman, Battle, Rhaney
STs 3 Hekker, GZ, McQuaid
Granted, if there is a player that is just too good not to keep, we could see some numbers shuffling.
Subject | Author | Views | Posted |
---|---|---|---|
Not likely to keep 9 DL. | RockRam | 1294 | August 16, 2016 02:12PM |
Re: Not likely to keep 9 DL. | LMU93 | 493 | August 16, 2016 02:22PM |
10th OL... due to Saffold | Atlantic Ram | 444 | August 16, 2016 05:42PM |
A question ...if you are rotational... | jemach | 394 | August 17, 2016 07:23PM |
Re: Only 8 is highly unlikely | dzrams | 504 | August 16, 2016 03:01PM |
who is Smith WR? | ferragamo79 | 458 | August 16, 2016 07:19PM |
Re: Not likely to keep 9 DL. | TonyHunter87 | 439 | August 16, 2016 11:22PM |
no Coples or Easley??? | SunTzu_vs_Camus | 433 | August 17, 2016 06:35AM |
Re: no Coples or Easley??? | BC Ramsfan | 511 | August 17, 2016 10:32AM |
Re: Not likely to keep 9 DL. | Rams43 | 378 | August 17, 2016 07:23AM |
Re: Not likely to keep 9 DL. | dzrams | 457 | August 17, 2016 07:48AM |
Re: Not likely to keep 9 DL. | Rams43 | 447 | August 17, 2016 08:44AM |
Re: Not likely to keep 9 DL. | dzrams | 464 | August 17, 2016 09:52AM |