Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Only 8 is highly unlikely

August 16, 2016 03:01PM
I don’t believe the Fisher Rams have ever carried only 8 DL. That alone makes it unlikely.

That said, there is no way to go by history because every year there is fluctuation in the number per position depending on the talent they have on hand.

One year recently he carried 11 OL; another year 5 LBs. Other years he has had 5 WRs and 5 RBs. The only positions that have had the same numbers every year is QB and STs with 3 each.

This year I’m not sure 6 LBs make it. IMO, Lynch is not a lock. We also may not see 10 OL. They seem to have picked up a lot of versatile OL which means they could do 9. BTW, Kish may be ahead of Rhaney.

On the WR’s, I doubt they do Cooper, Spruce, and Marquez. All three only play in the slot. Which means they would be very thin on the bigger outside WRs that Groh prefers. I wouldn't be surprised to see 7 here this year. BTW, who is Smith?

On the DL, I seriously doubt Thomas or Longacre are ahead of Easley in the depth chart hierarchy. I posted in another thread that PFF had Easley higher than Donald last year in QB pressure and sack rate. A rotational DT who can be as effective as Donald with 30 snaps per game is extremely valuable and a roster lock. The only question is his health. Since he is currently healthy, he is a roster lock IMO.

On the DBs you only listed 9 names there. It’s possible that they only carry 9.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Not likely to keep 9 DL.

RockRam1288August 16, 2016 02:12PM

  Re: Not likely to keep 9 DL.

LMU93493August 16, 2016 02:22PM

  10th OL... due to Saffold

Atlantic Ram442August 16, 2016 05:42PM

  A question ...if you are rotational...

jemach390August 17, 2016 07:23PM

  Re: Only 8 is highly unlikely

dzrams500August 16, 2016 03:01PM

  who is Smith WR?

ferragamo79455August 16, 2016 07:19PM

  Re: Not likely to keep 9 DL.

TonyHunter87437August 16, 2016 11:22PM

  no Coples or Easley???

SunTzu_vs_Camus432August 17, 2016 06:35AM

  Re: no Coples or Easley???

BC Ramsfan507August 17, 2016 10:32AM

  Re: Not likely to keep 9 DL.

Rams43373August 17, 2016 07:23AM

  Re: Not likely to keep 9 DL.

dzrams455August 17, 2016 07:48AM

  Re: Not likely to keep 9 DL.

Rams43444August 17, 2016 08:44AM

  Re: Not likely to keep 9 DL.

dzrams461August 17, 2016 09:52AM