Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Not likely to keep 9 DL.

August 16, 2016 02:12PM
Going by his history with the Rams, I think what we'll see is:

DBs 10 Gaines, Hill, Roberson, Tru J, Joyner, Alexander, McDonald, Davis, Sensebaugh, ?
LBs 6 Forest, Hagen, Lynch, Akers, Ogletree, Barron
DLs 8 Longacre, Westbrooks, Sims, Hayes, Thomas, Brockers, Donald, Quinn

QBs 3 Goff, Keenum, Mannion
RBs 4 Gurley, Cunningham, Brown, Reynolds
TE's 3 Harkey, Higbee, Kendricks
WRs 6 Britt, Austin, Spruce, Cooper, Marquez, Smith
OL 10 GRob, Saffold, Barnes, Brown, Havenstein, Williams, Reynolds, Wichman, Battle, Rhaney

STs 3 Hekker, GZ, McQuaid

Granted, if there is a player that is just too good not to keep, we could see some numbers shuffling.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 08/16/2016 02:14PM by RockRam.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Not likely to keep 9 DL.

RockRam1287August 16, 2016 02:12PM

  Re: Not likely to keep 9 DL.

LMU93492August 16, 2016 02:22PM

  10th OL... due to Saffold

Atlantic Ram440August 16, 2016 05:42PM

  A question ...if you are rotational...

jemach390August 17, 2016 07:23PM

  Re: Only 8 is highly unlikely

dzrams500August 16, 2016 03:01PM

  who is Smith WR?

ferragamo79454August 16, 2016 07:19PM

  Re: Not likely to keep 9 DL.

TonyHunter87437August 16, 2016 11:22PM

  no Coples or Easley???

SunTzu_vs_Camus431August 17, 2016 06:35AM

  Re: no Coples or Easley???

BC Ramsfan507August 17, 2016 10:32AM

  Re: Not likely to keep 9 DL.

Rams43373August 17, 2016 07:23AM

  Re: Not likely to keep 9 DL.

dzrams455August 17, 2016 07:48AM

  Re: Not likely to keep 9 DL.

Rams43444August 17, 2016 08:44AM

  Re: Not likely to keep 9 DL.

dzrams461August 17, 2016 09:52AM