August 10, 2016 06:15PM
Now if they miss the playoffs but finish 11-5 or 10-6 that's different (even if unlikely)

Fisher must go if the Rams don't win more than 8 games... He has essentially set the stage for it with his comments last night on hard knocks... He said 7, 8, 9, or even 10 wins aren't good enough. Yes he went there! He said they are too talented to not win more than 10 games

Show me...and if they are so talented and then don't win...then ultimately he should be held accountable.

I like Snead I think he's done a good job even though he has missed too. Pead, Quick, Watkins, Mason...but I would consider keeping him. It just wouldn't be a must... In other words I'm not keeping Snead if it means I might miss out on a great head coaching candidate who might have another preference. And let's say Snead stays do you turn over the hiring process to him?

What about you what do you think?
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Fisher, Snead or Both?

RamFanInPA888August 10, 2016 05:46AM

  Re: Fisher, Snead or Both?

oldschoolramfan558August 10, 2016 06:41AM

  Re: Fisher, Snead or Both?

Rams43447August 10, 2016 06:58AM

  Re: Fisher, Snead or Both?

RamFanInPA442August 10, 2016 08:15AM

  I hold a LOT of players accountable too.

Ramgator572August 10, 2016 08:22AM

  Both. Snead just as guilty

TonyHunter87533August 10, 2016 10:08AM

  On Snead.

RustyRay536August 10, 2016 10:24AM

  Re: Both. Snead just as guilty

Rams43429August 10, 2016 10:30AM

  Re: Product on the field

TonyHunter87472August 10, 2016 12:43PM

  Snead has very little to do with on field performance.

RustyRay415August 10, 2016 02:27PM

  Re: Snead has very little to do with on field performance.

TonyHunter87420August 10, 2016 04:00PM

  My initial is both...

DaJudge380August 10, 2016 01:00PM

  Re: a playoff appearance or he goes

Speed_Kills411August 10, 2016 06:15PM