Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: When Rams took Verse, taking Fiske became urgent priority #1

April 29, 2024 07:25AM
I don't think that is something that tipped the scales. There was a run on DTs. You pick 2-3 guys that you want to get at that position with your pick. 2 of them go and so you are left with 1. You see that as a priority position to get, but also scouted that there are 1-2 teams ahead of you that will also grab a DT.

This was more of a... "there's only 1 guy left that we were targeting" type of move vs let's pair them together so we have to trade up.

If Newton doesn't go and then other teams didn't make a run at Oro and Sweat, then I think the Rams would have stayed put.
They put their contingency plan on when their top DT targets came off the board quickly.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  When Rams took Verse, taking Fiske became urgent priority #1

RockRam292April 29, 2024 05:08AM

  Re: When Rams took Verse, taking Fiske became urgent priority #1

JamesHarrisFanClub88April 29, 2024 05:27AM

  Re: When Rams took Verse, taking Fiske became urgent priority #1

LaDoc78April 29, 2024 06:01AM

  Re: When Rams took Verse, taking Fiske became urgent priority #1

RamsDynasty68April 29, 2024 06:44AM

  Newton doesn't fit as well in Williams' position as Fiske, IMO

JimYoungblood5350April 29, 2024 07:19AM

  Thanks Blood for killing that dream

RamsDynasty43April 29, 2024 07:34AM

  Re: When Rams took Verse, taking Fiske became urgent priority #1

Rams4338April 29, 2024 07:26AM

  Don't think that can be done with NFL fronts like it used to. Attachments

JimYoungblood5361April 29, 2024 07:12AM

  Re: When Rams took Verse, taking Fiske became urgent priority #1

h2omelonhead43April 29, 2024 07:25AM