Previous Message Next Message
Forum List Message List New Topic Print View
OzRam
March 12, 2024 10:38PM
Both sound nice options if Wentz not returning. But I imagine that unless some team gets crazy with them offering a can't miss offer, these QBs will prob sit tight until nearer training camp.
Reply Quote
RSS
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Report: Mason Rudolph Has a Robust Free Agency Market

BerendsenRam313March 12, 2024 07:25PM

  If we dont bring Wentz back maybe ? After some time they both will be cheaper

BerendsenRam72March 12, 2024 07:33PM

  Re: If we dont bring Wentz back maybe ? After some time they both will be cheaper

Ramboni73March 12, 2024 07:49PM

  Tannehill or Flacco seem right with our line

since6875March 12, 2024 08:26PM

  Re: Tannehill or Flacco seem right with our line

OzRam51March 12, 2024 10:38PM

  Flacco I wouldn't mind either

BerendsenRam50March 12, 2024 11:04PM

  Re: Flacco I wouldn't mind either

OzRam43March 12, 2024 11:07PM

  I like Flacco if Wentz is gone

Stafford941March 13, 2024 03:56AM

  Why would Wentz be gone?

Ridgewood Ram51March 13, 2024 04:01AM

  I agree, but his mobility and running ability (to me) make him

Stafford939March 13, 2024 04:08AM

  Re: I agree, but his mobility and running ability (to me) make him

303032March 13, 2024 04:33AM

  Re: I agree, but his mobility and running ability (to me) make him

stlramz30March 13, 2024 06:14AM
Previous Message Next Message
Forum List Message List New Topic Print View



RamsFootballFans.comBucky's PubThe RamsFootballFans.com Tailgate PartyGame Time ForumHelp and Support ForumJack Youngblood ChatJim Everett ChatKevin Demoff ChatDeacon Jones Chat Thursday April 5th at 9pm est.Mike Karney Q&AAnnouncements Recent Messages