Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Tannehill or Flacco seem right with our line

Previous Message Next Message
Forum List Message List New Topic Print View
OzRam
March 12, 2024 10:38PM
Both sound nice options if Wentz not returning. But I imagine that unless some team gets crazy with them offering a can't miss offer, these QBs will prob sit tight until nearer training camp.
Reply Quote
RSS
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Report: Mason Rudolph Has a Robust Free Agency Market

BerendsenRam294March 12, 2024 07:25PM

  If we dont bring Wentz back maybe ? After some time they both will be cheaper

BerendsenRam67March 12, 2024 07:33PM

  Re: If we dont bring Wentz back maybe ? After some time they both will be cheaper

Ramboni62March 12, 2024 07:49PM

  Tannehill or Flacco seem right with our line

since6861March 12, 2024 08:26PM

  Re: Tannehill or Flacco seem right with our line

OzRam42March 12, 2024 10:38PM

  Flacco I wouldn't mind either

BerendsenRam45March 12, 2024 11:04PM

  Re: Flacco I wouldn't mind either

OzRam38March 12, 2024 11:07PM

  I like Flacco if Wentz is gone

Stafford936March 13, 2024 03:56AM

  Why would Wentz be gone?

Ridgewood Ram43March 13, 2024 04:01AM

  I agree, but his mobility and running ability (to me) make him

Stafford934March 13, 2024 04:08AM

  Re: I agree, but his mobility and running ability (to me) make him

303027March 13, 2024 04:33AM

  Re: I agree, but his mobility and running ability (to me) make him

stlramz25March 13, 2024 06:14AM
Previous Message Next Message
Forum List Message List New Topic Print View



RamsFootballFans.comBucky's PubThe RamsFootballFans.com Tailgate PartyGame Time ForumHelp and Support ForumJack Youngblood ChatJim Everett ChatKevin Demoff ChatDeacon Jones Chat Thursday April 5th at 9pm est.Mike Karney Q&AAnnouncements Recent Messages