Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: QB draft class myth

November 26, 2023 07:20AM
Quote
RockRam
We hear this constantly from the draft gurus. This is a good class, this is a bad class. And the truth is, no one has any idea how it will turn out 2 or 3 years down the line when these picks are asked to be top level NFL QBs. And, good-class/bad-class is relative. I don't see ANY great college QBs coming out that have done it for at least 2 years. Just some pretty good ones. And, of course, the ones that seem to get top billing get that billing because of highlight reel running....not pinpoint passing, or cerebral QB play.

Even more, every year some OK college QBs have a stellar year and suddenly they are deemed elite.

I flat don't believe in the "good-class/bad-class" scenario. And I hope neither does Snead. I do believe in the quantity of quality players at one position or another that happen to be coming out in any given year, but that more has to do with how deep into the draft you can get a good player at a specific position. Not how great any particular player is.

The Rams need to take the BPA at the time they draft in round 1 of QB, OL, DL, or CB . Maybe even WR if there is a really excellent guy who has been super productive at the college level. And guy who is really dynamic and likely to be a tough match-up. That could even be a special TE like Bowers. And the teams drafting before them will have a lot to say just who is there for the Rams to choose from. And, I also know that teams look ahead a couple of rounds and see how many guys they like will be likely to be available for them.

Yes, the draft is a crapshoot, especially for QB’s in the 1st.

But wouldn’t you rather take that crapshoot in a deep QB class rather than a shallow one? That’s what it comes down to, really.

Another thing. To be a serious playoff team one needs to have a good QB. There are almost no exceptions to this rule.

So, acquiring a good QB is Job One. Without such a QB nothing else much really matters.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Should Rams be committed and content with Matthew Stafford?

Rams43300November 23, 2023 09:20AM

  Re: Should Rams be committed and content with Matthew Stafford?

RockRam138November 23, 2023 10:58AM

  LMAO!!!!!!

ferragamo79151November 23, 2023 12:37PM

  Re: Should Rams be committed and content with Matthew Stafford?

Rampage2K-72November 25, 2023 01:00PM

  Re: Matthew Stafford?

leafnose46November 26, 2023 04:31AM

  For some reason, only part of my post went up

RockRam45November 26, 2023 04:52AM

  Re: Should Rams be committed and content with Matthew Stafford?

ramBRO57November 25, 2023 06:54PM

  Re: Should Rams be committed and content with Matthew Stafford?

mtramfan51November 25, 2023 11:09PM

  Re: Should Rams be committed and content with Matthew Stafford?

GRAM Torino40November 26, 2023 01:34AM

  Exactly. His skills haven't eroded: the team has

RockRam37November 26, 2023 05:40AM

  Re: Exactly. His skills haven't eroded: the team has

Rams4365November 26, 2023 05:57AM

  QB draft class myth

RockRam45November 26, 2023 06:14AM

  Re: QB draft class myth

Rams4354November 26, 2023 07:20AM

  There are other ways to acquire a good QB than the draft.

RockRam28November 26, 2023 09:47AM

  Re: There are other ways to acquire a good QB than the draft.

Rams4373November 26, 2023 10:23AM

  Re: Should Rams be committed and content with Matthew Stafford?

sfbayram46November 26, 2023 03:41AM

  In reality I think his contract kinda answers that question.....

roman1850November 26, 2023 05:58AM

  what odds we draft a better QB than Stafford???

SunTzu_vs_Camus78November 26, 2023 07:57AM

  Agreed, let's take another shot at the title in '24

merlin44November 26, 2023 12:57PM

  Re: Agreed, let's take another shot at the title in '24

GRAM Torino32November 26, 2023 02:28PM