Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Stafford would do better than he did, but he's more reckless

August 01, 2023 10:55PM
No doubt Stafford in far worse situation, though.

But all things being equal Rodgers > Stafford
based on a few factors ... accurate, fewer turnovers
running ... command of offense

BUT you're right, if both on good teams the
disparity in stats would be much. much closer

and I guess it is possible Stafford less streaky
because he wouldn't feel need to do so much

Stafford's one thing that is almost equal if not
equal to Rodgers is arm talent.

Stafford also is tougher.

But IMO, Rodgers has more touch and is more
accurate.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  It appears that Matthew Stafford will not be in the NFL Top 100, or even close

BerendsenRam282August 01, 2023 12:57PM

  Stafford is the Rodney Dangerfield of the NFL

Ramsdude80August 01, 2023 01:08PM

  Re: Stafford is the Rodney Dangerfield of the NFL

BerendsenRam62August 01, 2023 01:35PM

  that is horse dong

Stafford975August 01, 2023 04:19PM

  No. Attachments

JimYoungblood5387August 01, 2023 04:35PM

  Re: No.

stlramz97August 01, 2023 10:40PM

  Stafford would do better than he did, but he's more reckless

JimYoungblood5358August 01, 2023 10:55PM

  Exactly that is why I say they are the same

Stafford954August 02, 2023 01:48PM

  respect your opinion but with "Stafford" in your username

JimYoungblood5345August 02, 2023 01:59PM

  Oy Vey! lol

Ramsdude49August 02, 2023 03:51PM

  Agreed Stafford9!

Ramsdude95August 02, 2023 06:02AM

  Re: Agreed Stafford9!

JYB76August 02, 2023 06:40AM

  Re: Agreed Stafford9!

JimYoungblood5360August 02, 2023 07:01AM

  Re: Agreed Stafford9!

Rams4343August 02, 2023 06:58AM

  Correct 43 and on top of that

Ramsdude86August 02, 2023 08:25AM

  Such a travesty…

Rams43140August 01, 2023 03:19PM

  Re: It appears that Matthew Stafford will not be in the NFL Top 100, or even close

BumRap60August 02, 2023 03:30PM

  Extending when not needed?

Ramsdude39August 03, 2023 08:12AM