although I don't think of myself as particularly erudite.

Here's my take away from the experience.... first... I was taken in with the 'intro video'... duty, responsible, integrity. I admit it.... by the time that video ended I was ready to stand at attention and salute our justice system.

The law is fascinating... I'm reminded of the speech Tom Hank's gave about 'law' in the movie Philadelphia... I GET IT.

I could never have done it.... however. Been involved in it as a career that is: Here's why.. and this is NOT criticism... I understand why it has to be this way, must be this way... and I'm GLAD it is... because I don't think it would work as well any other way... BUT...

the tedium. Using the term 'snails pace' does not begin to describe the slow process of court procedure. It is excruciating. I don't know how you do it.... really, I don't. I EASILY get why... dotting all the I's.... coming as close to being 'fair' as it's humanly possible to be. Makes me proud of our system.. it truly does.

The Judge in this case sounds a lot like you.... he often would break the solemn mood with very kind and personal anecdotes regarding each of the jurors. If he found something in common with them... which he never failed to do, he would instantly latch on to it and establish good rapport with each juror. Nothing they said brought about a stern response from him.... one person actually said she would find the client guilty no matter what the evidence was... this from a bad experience... the judge was understanding, congenial, and kindly dismissed her.

So yes.. the tedium nearly drove me insane... but my admiration for those who take on this task is higher than it ever was... and it was pretty darned high to begin with. - JamesJM