January 03, 2023 08:50AM
Quote
Rams43
Quote
David Deacon
In a QB hungry league Baker Mayfield was released and only the Rams put in a claim for him. So a few weeks ago there wasn't a market for him and there wasn't any salary obstacles in the way.

If there isn't a market for Baker Mayfield as a starter with a multi year deal being offered it would make sense for him to spend a year or so as a backup in McVay offense. If you are going to be a backup as a young and talented QB go somewhere that is going to develop you skills and knowledge of the game. Rams would seem to be a good fit and the McVay/Baker relationship seems like a positive factor.

If there is a good market for him as as starter with starter money for multiple years then he has to take that deal but that deal may not be there for him. It sure would be nice to have him as the backup next season. I guess we will have to see how the QB market shapes up next season.

I continue to believe the following things:

BM has solid franchise QB potential. Emphasis potential.

McVay/Stafford would be the perfect learning spot for BM to polish his skills and achieve his potential.

Stafford will probably retire after the ‘24 season creating the perfect starting QB opening for BM and a nice fat contract. He could then enjoy a helluva 8-10 year career with Rams living the dream.

If BM and his agents can see the long term benefits of accepting a short term backup QB role then this could become a win-win-win situation for all parties, including we fans.

I don't disagree with anything you are saying except that IF there is a market for Baker as a starter next year and a multiyear contract 100Mil + contract I think it would be negligent for his agent not to push him in that direction.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Mayfield’s reputation as an ‘up and down’ inconsistent QB seems to be holding true, huh?

Rams43348January 02, 2023 09:00AM

  Could be... but I didn't think he played that badly yesterday...

JamesJM186January 02, 2023 09:23AM

  Re: Could be... but I didn't think he played that badly yesterday...

Rams43149January 02, 2023 10:21AM

  Too many variables for me to know....

JamesJM152January 02, 2023 10:30AM

  Re: Could be... but I didn't think he played that badly yesterday...

RamsFanSinceLA217January 03, 2023 08:09AM

  Re: Totally agree with this ^^^^^^^......That new car feeling.

oldschoolramfan89January 04, 2023 06:32AM

  Re: Could be... but I didn't think he played that badly yesterday...

jim beam182January 03, 2023 06:18AM

  In all fairness, Stafford wasn't exactly lighting things up either.

Ramgator111January 02, 2023 11:34AM

  Re: In all fairness, Stafford wasn't exactly lighting things up either.

Headslap75215January 02, 2023 01:03PM

  Re: Mayfield’s reputation as an ‘up and down’ inconsistent QB seems to be holding true, huh?

Payote75100January 02, 2023 08:49PM

  Re: Mayfield’s reputation as an ‘up and down’ inconsistent QB seems to be holding true, huh?

Old Goat91January 03, 2023 01:57AM

  Re: Mayfield’s reputation as an ‘up and down’ inconsistent QB seems to be holding true, huh?

Ramstien153January 03, 2023 03:54AM

  Re: Mayfield’s reputation as an ‘up and down’ inconsistent QB seems to be holding true, huh?

Classicalwit53January 07, 2023 03:19AM

  Maybe there won't be a market for him as a starter

David Deacon201January 03, 2023 02:30AM

  Re: Maybe there won't be a market for him as a starter

Rams43105January 03, 2023 05:39AM

  Re: Maybe there won't be a market for him as a starter

David Deacon81January 03, 2023 08:50AM

  Re: Maybe there won't be a market for him as a starter

Ramboni82January 03, 2023 05:20PM

  Re: Exactly 43.....I'm in the same boat!

oldschoolramfan128January 04, 2023 06:34AM