Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Why Rams whiff on DE Brian Burns is serious…

November 12, 2022 07:37AM
Why LA Rams whiff for Panthers DE Brian Burns is serious

[ramblinfan.com].

by Bret Stuter



The ability of the LA Rams front office to deliver exactly what the team needed when the team needed it has been legendary. When the Rams needed offensive line help in 2019, the Rams were able to trade for Cleveland Browns OL Austin Corbett and sign OL Coleman Shelton from the practice squad of the Arizona Cardinals.

Perhaps the most impressive run on mid-season additions occurred in 2021, when the Rams traded for New England Patriots RB Sony Michel, and Denver Broncos OLB Von Miller, and signed FA WR Odell Beckham Jr. to a roster that would win nine of their last ten games, including all four post-season contests to win Super Bowl LVI.

Curiously, not one of those additions is on the LA Rams roster today. One player signed elsewhere, one player’s contract expired, and has yet to sign with an NFL team, and one player was never offered a contract to return to the LA Rams. But that was not as concerning to the team as the latest set of events proved to be.

Panthers reject 2 generous Rams offers

The LA Rams tried to pry at least two key players from the Carolina Panthers. The first attempt was the well-documented bid for RB Christian McCaffrey, a player whom the Rams offered plenty:



Sterling Bennett
@49ers_Access
·
Follow
The Rams trade offer for Christian McCaffrey, per John Lynch:

- 2023 2nd & 3rd round picks
- 2024 4th & 5th round picks
- RB Cam Akers

The deciding factor was the #49ers willingness to offer a 2nd, 3rd and 4th round pick in the 2023 Draft.

via @TheAthletic | @timkawakami
10:36 AM · Nov 3, 2022

But the Rams also packaged a seriously valuable ransom for pass-rusher Brian Burns.



Jonathan Jones

@jjones9
·
Follow
The Rams had put a 2024 first, 2025 first and a 2023 second-round pick on the table for Panthers pass-rusher Brian Burns. Carolina refused to give up one of its core pieces

Ultimately, the Rams emerged empty-handed. Now, here’s why that could be more important than you think. Here’s why:

The LA Rams have long held to the practice of trading valuable but uncertain draft picks for certain NFL talent. That practice was successful as recently as 2021. But many NFL teams took notice and have since adopted that practice to build their own roster.

The Rams may need to reformulate their strategy

The Rams clearly need help at the running back and pass rush position. But unlike in the past, where the front office was able to deliver players to fulfill the greatest needs on a timely basis, the Rams were unable to upgrade either position at the trade deadline. While you could argue that the offensive line needed help, the Rams had already added three free-agent offensive linemen to the roster.

Had the Rams secured either McCaffrey or Burns or both, the team may be looking at 5-3 right now rather than 3-5. The San Francisco 49ers might be 3-5 instead of 4-4, and the Tampa Bay Buccaneers might be 3-6, rather than 4-5.

Wudda? Cudda? Shudda? No, I’m not here to argue some made-up scenario of what might have been. But it’s quite clear that a primary method of the LA Rams restocking this roster, exchanging valuable draft picks for game-changing players, is no longer as easy or as effective as it was as recently as one year ago.

At a minimum, it could mean that the LA Rams must improve their ability to successfully draft in the early rounds. At worst, it could mean that the Rams can no longer pry key contributors from other failing NFL teams. Can the Rams build a championship roster solely from the NFL Draft? We’ll examine that soon, but for now, it appears as though the Rams truly may need to develop a new strategy to build a strong roster.

It’s not for the lack of success at doing so. In fact, it’s quite the contrary. The Rams were so good at it that far too many NFL teams have adopted the same strategy.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Why Rams whiff on DE Brian Burns is serious…

Rams43507November 12, 2022 07:37AM

  CMC was worse...we'd be 5-3 if they pulled that one off

Rampage2K-113November 12, 2022 10:52AM

  What more could they offer for CMC?

roman18105November 12, 2022 11:26AM

  Re: What more could they offer for CMC?

Rampage2K-151November 12, 2022 11:59AM

  I agree. For the health of LONG TERM, I'm glad they passed on CMC.

Ramgator61November 13, 2022 04:38AM

  Looks good. Yep. Until McCaffery goes down to injury

NewMexicoRam150November 12, 2022 05:49PM

  Re: Why Rams whiff on DE Brian Burns is serious…

OzRam93November 12, 2022 11:31AM

  Re: Why Rams whiff on DE Brian Burns is serious…

george_allen151November 12, 2022 05:05PM

  Re: Why Rams whiff on DE Brian Burns is serious…

BerendsenRam62November 12, 2022 05:09PM

  Re: Why Rams whiff on DE Brian Burns is serious…

303073November 13, 2022 05:28AM

  Stuter fears that the Rams’ ability to continue trading premium picks for elite players is compromised.

Rams4335November 13, 2022 06:15AM